Another racially motivated church killing?

According to your article, he attended service there a few times. Why would he congregate with the white man if it was race based? Could be religion of peace
 
Last edited:
According to your article, he attended service there a few times. Why would he congregate with the white man if it was race based? Could be religion of peace

Probably for similar reasons a bank robber visits a bank he/she intends to rob multiple times before robbing it. That doesn't make the bank robber a big saver.
 
So when Dylan Roof shot up a black church due to his extremist ideology we heard politicians comment on it for days. When a black immigrant gunman shoots up a white church due to his extremist ideology all we hear are crickets.

Doesn't fit the narrative. Really as simple as that. If you view all the media as pushing a narrative, then it's to be expected.

Not referring to you, specifically. Anyone.
 
According to your article, he attended service there a few times. Why would he congregate with the white man if it was race based? Could be religion of peace
Which is why I used the ? mark. The point of my post is the lack of coverage by the MSM. Had the shooter been white launching an attack on a predominantly black church the coverage would be a wee bit more extensive. We would already be debating the act as a systemic representation of a larger problem of broad based racism in America. The shooter would of course be attached to other racist organizations and assumptions would be reported as fact. Instead we hear, authorities are investigating, next story. The absolutely stunning nature of the double standards used when reporting these events can only lead us to believe that an agenda and political ideology is being pushed by the media at large. The bias implemented and the complete lack of journalistic integrity is why we're at where we're at in this country. The division being created is not some random event. It is done with malice and forethought.
 
Last edited:
Which is why I used the ? mark. The point of my post is the lack of coverage by the MSM. Had the shooter been white launching an attack on a predominantly black church the coverage would be a wee bit more extensive. We would already be debating the act as a systemic representation of a larger problem of broad based racism in America. The shooter would of course be attached to other racist organizations and assumptions would be reported as fact. Instead we hear, authorities are investigating, next story. The absolutely stunning nature of the double standards used when reporting these events can only lead us to believe that an agenda and political ideology is being pushed by the media at large. The bias implemented and the complete lack of journalistic integrity is why we're at where we're at in this country. The divisions being created is not some random event. It is done with malice and forethought.

Try to find this Tennessee church shooting story on the home page of most of the MSM websites besides FOX. For the most part the story is not present, or can only be found in some obscure small print.

This also brings us around to the politicians. Within 24 hours of the Dylan Roof shooting nearly every politician nationwide had come out condemning the extremist ideology involved in the shooting while many tried to tie it to conservative ideals in general. With this current church shooting we have not heard a peep out of a politician from outside of Tennessee.
 
So when Dylan Roof shot up a black church due to his extremist ideology we heard politicians comment on it for days. When a black immigrant gunman shoots up a white church due to his extremist ideology all we hear are crickets.

It's a biracial congregation with a black preacher though
 
Back
Top