You know what? Your problem is simpler than I thought. You are just bored troll who's got way too much time on his hands. If you are smart enough to be able to do all the s*** that you claim you can, you would've done it already and made your millions or billions long time ago while "making a difference". Nowadays if you have just a half brilliant idea, people would shower money on you to make you the next IPO especially if you work in a "golden handcuff" job like you claim you do, you would've had all the connections you needed to start the venture work on what you want to do in "freedom". You wouldn't need to rely on retail trading to secure the financing and you certainly wouldn't be going on a forum to respond to every single post. No you are just bored, bored with your job, bored with your life, bored with your family if you have one, bored with everything. You just need some excitement in your life.
I'm an outlier. Don't judge me by the wisdom of the masses, which is what you're doing here.
1) Mass wisdom is perfectly fine with working SOME job and also implying it's your AWESOME life purpose. Masses are imbeciles and truly, directionless and purposeless. Give'm something and they'll follow.
Not me. I want something and whatever jobs I got so far are nowhere near scratching it. As long as what I want is not illegal, it's my prerogative to pursue it using the full spectrum of resources available.
2) Another mass wisdom perl of ass wisdom, derived from #1 is that it's not just OK, it's the only WAY, if you want to pursue some path, any path, the way to do it is beg some patron to bless you with a job on it. And if you can't find a patron and you're not already accidentally (#1) working on it then it's clearly your fault and you shouldn't get near it anyways.
Well, I want. Heck not want, need a lot of money for my purposes so as much as beggind and tailwagging trying to impress some rescuer to get me out of the basket of puppies heading out for extinction, that strategy just doesn't work reliably enough to be usable on SINGLE individuals. I need in the 80%-90% confidence before committing to something, the beggar strategy is in the 1-2%. Works fine for POPULATIONS and suits fine assholes selecting from populations. The bolsheviks correctly identified the latter but failed to identify the former. Some incipient political moves of this century correctly identified the former but there's a lot more to a winning strategy than what the previous centuries were doing.
#3) Perhaps we could start a rational discussion on what drives us here, where we want to go and what means are we considering for that?
First axiom of the 21'st century: risk is good. Experimenting is risky and with 99.99% probability it'll fail. Works fine for populations but not for leaders, check Khrushchev for instance. Guy reformed the murderous Soviet system and experimented with eccentric agricultural reforms. First one worked marvellously (00.01% probability of survival), second one was a 99.99% guaranteed failure.
Morale for this century should be what the Russians always knew.