Another new low for Democrats

[Tsing Tao]

Again, what matters is the stereotype that transpires to all Hispanics. The same is true for the Trump ad.

But there is no stereotype against Hispanics, that's just it. If, and this is a big stretch I can see you making, there is a stereotype it is that illegal aliens are being stereotyped as gang members. But, as I said, that is a stretch. What the ads are stating is that Sanctuary Cities protect Illegal Immigrants and that some illegal immigrants have been found to be horrendously violent and criminal. Ergo, Sanctuary Cities protect gang members and violent criminals.

But, I’m about to really throw you guys off, illegal immigration isn’t a crime. It is neither a felony nor a misdemeanor. It’s actually a civil offense. So depicting illegal immigrants as criminals is another misnomer.

You're being misleading. Unlawful Presence is a civil offense. Illegal Immigration is almost always (in the case of the discussion on Sanctuary Cities) accompanied by Improper Entry, which is most certainly a crime punishable by 6 months in prison. Regardless, even in the case of Unlawful Presence, the penalty is deportation - which the Federal Government is being frustrated in by Sanctuary Cities.

 

[UsualName]

But there is no stereotype against Hispanics, that's just it. If, and this is a big stretch I can see you making, there is a stereotype it is that illegal aliens are being stereotyped as gang members. But, as I said, that is a stretch. What the ads are stating is that Sanctuary Cities protect Illegal Immigrants and that some illegal immigrants have been found to be horrendously violent and criminal. Ergo, Sanctuary Cities protect gang members and violent criminals.



You're being misleading. Unlawful Presence is a civil offense. Illegal Immigration is almost always (in the case of the discussion on Sanctuary Cities) accompanied by Improper Entry, which is most certainly a crime punishable by 6 months in prison. Regardless, even in the case of Unlawful Presence, the penalty is deportation - which the Federal Government is being frustrated in by Sanctuary Cities.

Again we are going in circles. I have made my point that you cannot distinguish between someone in America legally vs illegally and the ads depict Hispanics as being in America illegally. There is no way to distinguish. This is why you never answered my question of how can you tell who is here legally vs illegally. That is where the stereotype crosses over - but you have totally ignored this.

 

[UsualName]

Here is a great example of how stereotypes cross over

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ftermath-of-trump-win/?utm_term=.c13885210eb0

 

[Tsing Tao]

Again we are going in circles. I have made my point that you cannot distinguish between someone in America legally vs illegally and the ads depict Hispanics as being in America illegally.

No, they don't. That's the point. The ads do not depict Hispanics as being in America illegally. The ads depict gang members being protected by Sanctuary Cities, and calling out one - in particular - as being an illegal alien. No where else does it say or indicate "Hispanics are in America illegally" as a general concept.

There is no way to distinguish. This is why you never answered my question of how can you tell who is here legally vs illegally. That is where the stereotype crosses over - but you have totally ignored this.

I haven't ignored it at all. You can easily tell who is here legally by looking at their documentation. But that has nothing to do with the fact that none of the ads you provided have anything whatsoever to do with this concept.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Here is a great example of how stereotypes cross over

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ftermath-of-trump-win/?utm_term=.c13885210eb0

So a number of students chanted "Build the Wall" for a few seconds. What stereotype was being "crossed over" here??

 

[UsualName]

No, they don't. That's the point. The ads do not depict Hispanics as being in America illegally. The ads depict gang members being protected by Sanctuary Cities, and calling out one - in particular - as being an illegal alien. No where else does it say or indicate "Hispanics are in America illegally" as a general concept.



I haven't ignored it at all. You can easily tell who is here legally by looking at their documentation. But that has nothing to do with the fact that none of the ads you provided have anything whatsoever to do with this concept.

Nowhere does it say in the ad Trumps voters run over immigrant and minority children either. So, what’s your problem?

 

[UsualName]

So a number of students chanted "Build the Wall" for a few seconds. What stereotype was being "crossed over" here??

That chant was done to harass Hispanic students in the cafeteria regardless of immigration status. You will argue anything.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Nowhere does it say in the ad Trumps voters run over immigrant and minority children either. So, what’s your problem?

I never claimed it did. You claimed it did and I followed your argument for reasoning, calling it "The Trump Ad" or referring to the Trump voter angle in post one.

 

[Tsing Tao]

That chant was done to harass Hispanic students in the cafeteria regardless of immigration status. You will argue anything.

You will imagine anything if it supports your argument. Who knows exactly why those students decided to chant it. You assume to know, I do not. They could have been celebrating Trump's win. They could believe in enforcing immigration law. They could have done it for a whole host of reasons. You pick the reason that best suits your narrative, without any proof whatsoever. I simply do not know.

 

[UsualName]

I never claimed it did. You claimed it did and I followed your argument for reasoning, calling it "The Trump Ad".

So then does the confederate flag ad stereotype, or do you only have an opinion on ads that stereotype Hispanics?