You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Another birth certificate suit thrown out of court
- Thread starter insider trading
- Start date
Quote from jem:
the army did back down.
it was reported they revoked the order.
Now when the hell does the army revoke deployment orders because of a law suit or protester?
You know... admit it.
They revoked it because he had the right not to go.If he said he didn't want to go,legally he didn't have to go
"Incidentally, Cook did not have to hire a lawyer to refuse his orders to go to Afghanistan. As a reserve soldier and volunteer, he has the right to revoke his deployment orders"
"Incidentally, Cook did not have to hire a lawyer to refuse his orders to go to Afghanistan. As a reserve soldier and volunteer, he has the right to revoke his deployment orders"
"Incidentally, Cook did not have to hire a lawyer to refuse his orders to go to Afghanistan. As a reserve soldier and volunteer, he has the right to revoke his deployment orders"
"Incidentally, Cook did not have to hire a lawyer to refuse his orders to go to Afghanistan. As a reserve soldier and volunteer, he has the right to revoke his deployment orders"
"Incidentally, Cook did not have to hire a lawyer to refuse his orders to go to Afghanistan. As a reserve soldier and volunteer, he has the right to revoke his deployment orders"
I guess you do not read so well - you are falling for bullshit spin.
He had orders - he did not revoke them the army did.
Now - if you presented me with some sort of precedent that says the army has to revoke an order when a soldiers deployment is optional - you might have an argument.
without that vital piece of info -- as of now - it looks to me like your logic sucks and you fell for a red herring.
He had orders - he did not revoke them the army did.
Now - if you presented me with some sort of precedent that says the army has to revoke an order when a soldiers deployment is optional - you might have an argument.
without that vital piece of info -- as of now - it looks to me like your logic sucks and you fell for a red herring.
Quote from insider trading:
The whole thing was a scam to get a birth certificate case to be heard by a court, it failed like all the rest.Pathetic the lengths these idiots will go
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/07/15/soldier-claims-obama-isnt-legal-president-doesnt-deploy/
In May(After Obama was President) he volunteered for Afghan duty
"Cook is an "individual mobilization augmentee," or a reserve soldier assigned to an active component unit for duty, the newspaper said. He submitted a formal written request to Human Resources Command-St. Louis on May 8 volunteering to serve on year in Afghanistan."
Then he decides he doesn't want to go and tries to make a court case out of it.BTW,He didn't have to go if he didn't want to ,thats why the order was rescinded
"Incidentally, Cook did not have to hire a lawyer to refuse his orders to go to Afghanistan. As a reserve soldier and volunteer, he has the right to revoke his deployment orders"
Of course it failed... they rescinded his orders.... Brilliant move on obamas part... Also, proof there is no long form birth certificate..
Seriously people... when was the last time you heard of the Military rescinding orders... If they had a leg to stand on, cook would have been court martialed....
Quote from insider trading:
For those of you who cant figure it out,it was never about fighting his orders to deploy or the Army backing down.
Cook volunteered to deploy in May 2009, then in July 2009 said he wouldn't go and wanted to challenge Obamas citizenship
If Cook really didn't want to go because he thought Obama wasn't President ,why did he volunteer in May after Obama was already sworn into office ?
This whole circus act was a ploy to get a court to hear the birth certificate case,and like all others it was thrown out
OMG, that's simple... he wasn't aware if the issue then.... No one was...
Quote from NKNY:
OMG, that's simple... he wasn't aware if the issue then.... No one was...
OMG,this shows how clueless the birth certificate conspiracy group really is
Nobody knew about in May 2009 when cook volunteered for Afghan duty ?,sorry pal but courts have been trowing out birth certificate cases since last year
In May of 2009 Cook didn't know about the birth certificate issue,but in July 2009 he did ?
why don't you go through all those cases and show me one case which which was decided on the merits. In other words one case which weighed the birth certificate evidence and said Obama produced proof he was born in america.
Absent that your statement that the courts are throwing out cases is misleading.
Courts throwing cases out for procedural reasons - give no indication of whether Obama has any reliable proof that he was born in America.
The birth certificates produced so far by the left - lack foundation (in legal terms) and as such are vulnerable to attack as hearsay. In my legal opinion.
Sooner or later some the evidence will be tested. If there is no reliable evidence that will be one answer. However, I hope someone will produce reliable evidence and end this issue.
But, it sure does leave me wondering what the hell is the problem with Obama producing reliable evidence.
Absent that your statement that the courts are throwing out cases is misleading.
Courts throwing cases out for procedural reasons - give no indication of whether Obama has any reliable proof that he was born in America.
The birth certificates produced so far by the left - lack foundation (in legal terms) and as such are vulnerable to attack as hearsay. In my legal opinion.
Sooner or later some the evidence will be tested. If there is no reliable evidence that will be one answer. However, I hope someone will produce reliable evidence and end this issue.
But, it sure does leave me wondering what the hell is the problem with Obama producing reliable evidence.