I had a Galaxy S, the original Samsung Galaxy phone. It was terrible for making calls, had to use speaker, the gps sucked, couldn't get a fix almost anywhere, that made directions via maps useless. It got all these great reviews though. Gotta think it's because all the bullshit reviewers want free stuff to review. I have a Galaxy Note 2. It got great reviews too, of course it did... It works, sort of. If I touch the metallic looking edge of the phone it takes that as a touchscreen tap and does random stuff. That means there is almost no chance I can put it in my pocket without the touchscreen being activated. If I install an app the side effects can be awful, like the phone ringer is off and I miss calls and it requires all sorts of fiddling to find out what obscure setting in what obscure menu got fuckedup by the new app. The whole android thing is a bad idea from the start. Anybody can make an app, register with Google for $25 and nobody checks to see if their apps work or mess up the phone. Apple checks all those apps, and charges a lot for a phone...
So I'm wondering if the Windows Phone isn't a good thing? Android has a choice of krappy little meaningless, hard to distinguish icons or widgets that take half the screen and do almost nothing. Windows has the resizeable tiles that actually give info at a glance and look good... Nokia makes some windows phones with astounding cameras too...
So I'm wondering if the Windows Phone isn't a good thing? Android has a choice of krappy little meaningless, hard to distinguish icons or widgets that take half the screen and do almost nothing. Windows has the resizeable tiles that actually give info at a glance and look good... Nokia makes some windows phones with astounding cameras too...
