And we have another cops kneeling on a man killing him situation

Exactly. Resisting arrest is the stupidest thing one can do. The officers already made up their mind, nothing will change their decision to handcuff once decided. Fight that afterwards if there is disagreement.

I cannot imagine a situation where I would not willingly submit to detainment for any reason at all and then, if a problem, sort it out later through legal channels.
 
But it raises questions:

Cops cannot illegally detain or kick you off a premise for no reason but cops always act like they have the right to detain you for any reason whatsoever.

Cops are now videotaped making blatant mistkaes in identifying people so a citizen should have the right to demand to know why they are being detained.

If you get pulled over and a cop says hand me your license and get out of the car... why should we agree without some explanation or cause?

Cops violate the Constitution repeatedly and then get to wipe it all out with the old "resisting arrest"

Is it illegal to refuse to show your ID to a cop who asks for it without any probably cause or rationale?

How many times has this happened:

"Show me your ID"
"Why"
"That's it... put your hands behind your back"
"No"
"Resisting arrest!" beat down

The constitution demands higher standards than this and I am not going to put up with those in charge of enforcing the law deciding the law does not apply to them (same with politicians)

I don't disagree with just about anything you said in this. But that doesn't change the fact that if a cop confronts me and I feel they are unjustified in their confrontation or line of questioning, or demands, etc., I would comply with them at the point of confrontation and sort it out legally, later. To challenge the cop at the point of confrontation means I subject myself to that cop's mercy. He has the law, a weapon, and backup at that point in time. Regardless of whether he is in the right.

So you'd have to be an idiot (in my mind) to try to pick a fight with him.
 
I don't disagree with just about anything you said in this. But that doesn't change the fact that if a cop confronts me and I feel they are unjustified in their confrontation or line of questioning, or demands, etc., I would comply with them at the point of confrontation and sort it out legally, later. To challenge the cop at the point of confrontation means I subject myself to that cop's mercy. He has the law, a weapon, and backup at that point in time. Regardless of whether he is in the right.

So you'd have to be an idiot (in my mind) to try to pick a fight with him.


Sure but often the cop brings the fight to the person. I still think it is setting up the right for the police officer to do whatever he wants and you just have to take it and later on do what?

File a complaint? What if there is no video evidence? Your word against a cop, I know who wins.
 
Sure but often the cop brings the fight to the person. I still think it is setting up the right for the police officer to do whatever he wants and you just have to take it and later on do what?

File a complaint? What if there is no video evidence? Your word against a cop, I know who wins.

If there is no video evidence, you're going to lose either way. At least my way involves me not getting killed.
 
Some people comply, get handcuffed and get put into a patrol car...

They still get shot multiple times.

In this case, the guy was probably killed because he called the police officer's mom a bad name or he refused to suck the cop's dick.
In my opinion, its police shootings like that...reason why people in some communities fear the police even when they're handcuffed with the arms behind their back and unarmed.

I'm not being sarcastic with the dick story...I do remember a situation when I was in the military and stationed in Kentucky (Fort Campbell)...a friend of mine (a military officer too) was arrested for speeding late at night on a dark road.

He said the cop handcuffed him with his arms behind his back, put him in the back seat of the police car and the cop became very angry after my friend refused to give the cop a blow job.
  • He argued multiple times with the cop to give him his speeding ticket and let him go on his way.
He actually thought the cop was going to shoot him dead right there...with no witnesses around.

Cop later fired from his job (to protect the community) only after other similar like complaints from other individuals. Yet, it does make me wonder how many others didn't file a complaint.

Sick World

wrbtrader
 
Last edited:
Well the guy has an 180 page rap sheet... quite a record. and the county is strongly pushing back on the families narrative.

The North Carolina county where police shot Andrew Brown Jr. is dismissing 'false internet rumors' using a Fox News story about his 'criminal rap sheet'
https://www.insider.com/andrew-brown-pasquotank-county-fatal-police-shooting-fact-sheet-2021-4
  • Pasquotank County is dismissing what it calls "false internet rumors" about Andrew Brown's death.
  • The county's webpage notes Brown's criminal history and pushes back against "unproven hyperbole."
  • Brown was fatally shot by a Pasquotank County Sheriff's deputy last week.

The North Carolina county where a sheriff's deputy fatally shot Andrew Brown Jr. last week is dismissing "false internet rumors" on its official website, noting a report about his criminal history and denouncing "hyperbole."

Pasquotank County published a page titled "Check the Facts" which claims to feature "factual information to correct any false information and rumors that are circulating."

The post calls claims made by Brown's family lawyers "false internet rumors" and cites Brown's criminal history as a reason why a SWAT team was sent to his house to serve an arrest warrant.

At one point in response to criticisms about the SWAT team's involvement, the county says Brown "had a criminal 'rap sheet' more than 180 pages long, dating to 1988," and cites a Fox News story. The fact sheet also lists an Associated Press story in its claim but pulls details only from the Fox News report.

The "fact sheet" also calls claims that Brown was "murdered" an "unproven hyperbole that only inflames the community."

Brown was fatally shot last week while Pasquotank County Sheriff's deputies were arresting him on felony drug charges.

The sheriff's office said Brown was fleeing at the time of the shooting. Lawyers for Brown's family say Brown had his hands on the steering wheel of the car he was driving. The attorneys also claimed an autopsy they commissioned found Brown died from a "kill shot" to the back of his head.

The webpage dismisses the criticism from Brown's family that they only saw 20 seconds of the encounter where Brown was fatally shot.

The county said the entire encounter "lasted less than 20 seconds."

"The family viewed the entire encounter," the website says. "The family was able to watch the video 10-20 times." The county's fact sheet also claims that the family only saw the one video because "the time needed to blur faces of the additional video would've delayed us from showing the family the video on Monday as they requested."

County officials did not immediately respond to Insider's request for comment. Representatives from Fox News also did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment.

Seven deputies have been placed on administrative leave while the shooting is investigated, and three others have resigned. None have been criminally charged as of Wednesday.


The entire Brown family has lengthy rap sheets...
https://pasquotankgop.com/andrew-browns-arrest-record-and-legacy/
 
So what you're saying is,
that if someone, and his family has a long rap sheet,
The Constitution no longer applies to them?

Again, I really think you'd love Russia, North Korea, or China.

If you deliberately run over two cops while driving your vehicle then the probable result invokes gunfire.
 
If you deliberately run over two cops while driving your vehicle then the probable result invokes gunfire.
We can discuss that later if we both decide to.

I'm asking why you thought the rap sheet was relevant, to the cops shooting him in the back of the head?

Again, are you suggesting that The Constitution doesn't apply due to his, and his families' rap sheets?
 
We can discuss that later if we both decide to.

I'm asking why you thought the rap sheet was relevant, to the cops shooting him in the back of the head?

Again, are you suggesting that The Constitution doesn't apply due to his, and his families' rap sheets?


GWB always shows his MAGA when it comes to race.From Travon Martin to kneeling to Brown etc he is always on the side of the supremacists.
 
Back
Top