And then God said, let there be substance

Given that the second debate is a format where the candidates take question directly from an audience, this debate should be orders of magnitude more important and qualitative than the first.

As I stated elsewhere, I am hoping that some subset of these issues are addressed, and the specific proposals for their resolution within the policies of the candidate:

  • Income Inequality
  • Bridging the chasm between the two parties in Washington
  • Lobbying on K-street
  • Health Care
  • What is a human right from the standpoint of US policy
  • Gun control
  • The colossal debt
  • Raising GDP
  • Global Warming
  • Protecting Intellectual Property from hacking
  • Citizens United
  • Opinion on Unions: Private vs Public
  • Community Policing
  • Astronomical Higher Education costs
  • Crumbling Infrastructure
  • A Tax code no one understands which is horribly unfair
  • Trade: TPP, NAFTA, etc
  • Stopping inversions
  • Criminal Justice reform
  • Human Trafficking
  • Immigration
  • Inflation/Deflation/Stagflation - The FED as it relates to world problems
  • Terrorism
  • Dumbing down of K-12
  • Syria
  • China
  • Israel
  • North Korea
  • Russia
  • Paid leave
  • Budget for a crumbling military
  • Veteran well being
  • Equal pay for equal work
  • Right to choose
  • Choice for Supreme Court justice
  • LGBT rights
  • NATO, can we afford it
  • Nuclear weapons proliferation
  • Nation building and exporting Democracy
  • etc, etc, etc...


These are actual questions that should be asked. In reality... the questions that WILL be asked...you know, the "important" shit, will be like...

"Mr. Trump, You called a woman fat 20 years and only 11 years ago you talked about grabbing a womans pussy. Why don't you just drop out now?"

And...

"Secretary Clinton, How will it feel if you're the first female president?"

Then later on CNN, the pundits will be all "Wow, did you see how Hillary totally dominated Trump in the debate? I mean the way she answered about being the first female president was so inspiring while Drumpf couldn't stop stammering. I mean, I literally didn't even listen to a word he said he was so boring"
 
These are actual questions that should be asked. In reality... the questions that WILL be asked...you know, the "important" shit, will be like...

"Mr. Trump, You called a woman fat 20 years and only 11 years ago you talked about grabbing a womans pussy. Why don't you just drop out now?"

And...

"Secretary Clinton, How will it feel if you're the first female president?"

Then later on CNN, the pundits will be all "Wow, did you see how Hillary totally dominated Trump in the debate? I mean the way she answered about being the first female president was so inspiring while Drumpf couldn't stop stammering. I mean, I literally didn't even listen to a word he said he was so boring"
You appear to have forgotten, peil, that you have blood coming out of your whatever.
 
They should ask her why her unfavorable rating is so high.

Hillary-Clinton-Unfavorable-Ratings.jpg


And whatya know, the only liberal candidate had a favorable rating among Dem voters:

$
 
We can just cut to the chase. Clinton wants open borders, wide open borders. In plain English she wants no borders at all. She wants to eliminate the word immigrant. There are no immigrants in the mind of the open border leftist. You set foot in American, you are immediate a citizen with all rights and privileges, period.
What open borders means is the wholesale dismantling of our country. Open borders results in more crime, more terrorism, and far fewer opportunities for employment that will sustain a family. These are the facts. There is no greater threat to our way of life than an open border policy. Or we can fret over some billionaire playboy grabbing some broads ass at a beauty contest. It's decision time America. We can vote for a guy who chases pussy and gets the rest of the job done regardless, or we can vote for a woman who advocates the destruction of our society with a policy that only a fool or a anarchist would support.
 
Breaking: Trump has brought Clinton sex victims to debate. Great, let's clear the air. Now all the Trump supporters on ET are going to be happy, and maybe tens of millions more. Let's see how well this works for him in growing his base.

On the other hand, I am seriously considering not even bothering watching this debate. I am saddened that this is what these people think are the issues in this country when there are millions of children living in poverty, and grown men and women living in their cars or in cardboard houses.

I hope Clinton doesn't hold this against Trump supporters. Move away from believing in "deplorables".
 
Last edited:
We can just cut to the chase. Clinton wants open borders, wide open borders. In plain English she wants no borders at all. She wants to eliminate the word immigrant. There are no immigrants in the mind of the open border leftist. You set foot in American, you are immediate a citizen with all rights and privileges, period.
What open borders means is the wholesale dismantling of our country. Open borders results in more crime, more terrorism, and far fewer opportunities for employment that will sustain a family. These are the facts. There is no greater threat to our way of life than an open border policy. Or we can fret over some billionaire playboy grabbing some broads ass at a beauty contest. It's decision time America. We can vote for a guy who chases pussy and gets the rest of the job done regardless, or we can vote for a woman who advocates the destruction of our society with a policy that only a fool or a anarchist would support.
Don't forget the Supreme Court. Its the most important thing here. Hands down.

Popcorn done... beer chilled..... futures are green 42 points........ here we go.
10/9/16 858PM EST.
 
Back
Top