https://www.forbes.com/sites/anthon...come-obsolete-if-us-digital-currency-existed/
Here is the first (or second, depending on how deep into theories you are) rollout of getting the public ok with a FedCoin
Pow still wrong tho, BTC and a few other Alt coins wont become obsolete.
Bloomberg commentary this morning:-
"The European Central Bank will decide today whether to move to the next phase of
development of a digital euro.
While the discussion about the need for central bank digital currencies
remains robust, I want to take a minute to try to figure out what it is they actually are.
To use an analogy, “digital currency” is quite like “football.” Because, depending on where you are in the world, football means different things. The recent
European football championship was won by Italy. Unless you are American, in which case Italy won the soccer championship. In the U.S., football is an entirely different sport which has almost nothing in common with the version played in the rest of the world.
I’m Irish, and we have our own sport here
called football.
Whether you are Italian, or Irish, or American, you know what you mean when you say “football.” It’s just entirely different from what other people mean.
Likewise with digital currencies. Most people think “Bitcoin” when they think digital currency. If, to continue the analogy, Bitcoin is (Italian) football, then something like Dogecoin would be (Irish) football and CBDCs would be (American) football.
CBDCs will have few of the features of Bitcoin, they will not be anonymous, they will not be an asset class in themselves, and there may even be controls on how much a person can hold. It’s hard to see how digital currency advocates will get excited about them at all.
So, a CBDC is not really a “digital currency” in the traditional sense. Basically, it is a slightly
more efficient payment system with good cheerleaders."