And...more...Winning! New policy requires on-field players, personnel to stand for anthem

New policy requires on-field players, personnel to stand for anthem
play




0:06
/
0:47




dm_180523_ngl_goodell_anthem_presser_1.jpg





12:46 PM ET
  • Kevin Seifert
  • Dan Graziano

ATLANTA -- NFL owners have unanimously approved a new national anthem policy that requires players to stand if they are on the field during the performance but gives them the option to remain in the locker room if they prefer, it was announced Wednesday.

The new policy subjects teams to a fine if a player or any other team personnel do not show respect for the anthem. That includes any attempt to sit or kneel, as dozens of players have done during the past two seasons. Those teams will also have the option to fine any team personnel, including players, for the infraction.

"This season, all league and team personnel shall stand and show respect for the flag and the Anthem," NFL commissioner Roger Goodell said in a statement. "Personnel who choose not to stand for the Anthem may stay in the locker room until after the Anthem has been performed.

"We believe today's decision will keep our focus on the game and the extraordinary athletes who play it -- and on our fans who enjoy it."

A vote took place at the conclusion of the league's spring meetings and was approved by all 32 owners.

The requirement that all players be on the field during the playing of the national anthem will be removed from the league's game operations manual, allowing for those who wish not to stand to remain in the locker room or "a similar location off the field" until the playing of the national anthem is complete.

Goodell said the NFL is "dedicated to continuing our collaboration with players to advance the goals of justice and fairness in all corners of our society."

After spending months in discussions, owners believe this found a compromise that will end sitting or kneeling with an edict that stops short of requiring every player to stand.

The previous policy required players to be on the field for the anthem but said only that they "should" stand. When then-San Francisco 49ersquarterback Colin Kaepernick began kneeling to protest police brutality in 2016, the league had no rule it could use to prevent it. The movement drew increasing criticism from President Donald Trump, as well as many fans, who believed it was a sign of disrespect toward the flag and country.

Owners, however, had been divided on how to extricate the league from that criticism. Some owners, including the Dallas Cowboys' Jerry Jones and the Houston Texans' Bob McNair, wanted all players to stand. Others, such as the New York Jets' Christopher Johnson, wanted to avoid any appearance of muzzling players.

Even the seemingly simple option of clearing the field prior to the anthem was rejected by some owners who thought it would be interpreted as a mass protest or at least a sign of disrespect.

"The efforts by many of our players sparked awareness and action around issues of social justice that must be addressed," Goodell said in the statement. "The platform that we have created together is certainly unique in professional sports and quite likely in American business. We are honored to work with our players to drive progress.

"It was unfortunate that on-field protests created a false perception among many that thousands of NFL players were unpatriotic. This is not and was never the case."

Kaepernick and former 49ers safety Eric Reid have both filed collusion cases against the league after failing to find jobs as free agents.

The new policy is an adjustment to the NFL's game operations manual and thus does not need to be collectively bargained.

"We were not consulted ahead of this meeting on any potential changes to the anthem policy," NFL Players Association assistant executive director of external affairs George Atallah said in a statement. "If there are changes to the policy that put players in a position where they could be disciplined or fined, we are going to do what we always do -- fight anything that encroaches on players' rights to the end."
 
I thought Tony and the tribe of lefties here told us the NFL doesn't care about what people like us who think about respect for the flag.

I thought Tony told us the NFL does not care about their fans who have the money to buy the things the NFL advertisers sell?

I thought they told us the NFL was going to be fine and were not worrying about the ratings dump and the fans being alienated because all that matters was virtue signaling the approved ideology.
 
Last edited:
I thought Tony and the tribe of lefties here told us the NFL doesn't care about what people like us who think about respect for the flag.

I thought Tony told us the NFL does not care about their fans who have the money to buy the things the NFL advertisers sell?

I thought they told us the NFL was going to be fine and were not worrying about the ratings dump and the fans be alienated because all that matters was virtue signaling the approved ideology.

Well done on the use of punctuation today Jem. Big step up for you man.
 
grammar police on an anonymous trading site?

http://www.pennlive.com/news/2016/06/a_guide_to_punctuation_on_the.html

David Crystal, a professor of linguistics at the University of Wales, Bangor, told the New York Times the disappearance of the period is a testament to the Internet age

"We are at a momentous moment in the history of the full stop," he said

The period according to Crystal no longer means to stop but is instead a show of anger, irony and insincerity

And while the period and the comma get the short end of the stick the exclamation and question marks are thriving

Confused????? Here's how to interpret all the punctuation on the Internet:

The Period


Both the oldest punctuation mark and the most controversial

If you put it after "Fine." or "No." they suddenly become "Fine and why don't you stop being such a jerk" and "No and I hate you with the fire of 1000 suns"

They can also mean that you're texting with someone who is over the age of 35 and doesn't quite understand the volatility of their punctuation choice

http://www.pennlive.com/news/2016/06/a_guide_to_punctuation_on_the.html

more at link...
 
grammar police on an anonymous trading site?

http://www.pennlive.com/news/2016/06/a_guide_to_punctuation_on_the.html

David Crystal, a professor of linguistics at the University of Wales, Bangor, told the New York Times the disappearance of the period is a testament to the Internet age

"We are at a momentous moment in the history of the full stop," he said

The period according to Crystal no longer means to stop but is instead a show of anger, irony and insincerity

And while the period and the comma get the short end of the stick the exclamation and question marks are thriving

Confused????? Here's how to interpret all the punctuation on the Internet:

The Period


Both the oldest punctuation mark and the most controversial

If you put it after "Fine." or "No." they suddenly become "Fine and why don't you stop being such a jerk" and "No and I hate you with the fire of 1000 suns"

They can also mean that you're texting with someone who is over the age of 35 and doesn't quite understand the volatility of their punctuation choice

http://www.pennlive.com/news/2016/06/a_guide_to_punctuation_on_the.html

more at link...

Well writing "Fine." (full stop) alone has always been a terse response, even by voice. I recall in school (we did some ancient Greek) the teacher giving as an example of 'spartan language'.

"
“IF”
A perfect representation of Spartan character. As Philip II of Macedon was conquering Greek city-states left and right, Sparta was left alone. Philip had achieved a crushing victory, and Sparta was relatively weak and without walls. Philip sent a message to the Spartans saying “If I invade Lakonia you will be destroyed, never to rise again.” The Spartans replied with one word, “If.”

Philip eventually decided to bypass Sparta as it was a poor region and not worth the fight. Neither Philip nor Alexander attacked the Spartans while they ruled.
"

I don't write formally anymore due to years of corporate email gibberish bending my neurons but as a kid we were taught not to write simply as one speaks.

The reason for this is, paraphrasing for brevity, that written language involves further data compression of spoken language which is itself a poor facsimile of the originator's thoughts.

Whole swathes of information are lost when one is not talking to another in person. To compensate for this strict formality helps a lot though the odd smiley or other is useful, Poe's law etc. :)

I would say that I find the series Deadwood beautifully written and a great example of how educated people perhaps used to speak (usually when asking the very dangerous Al for a favor).
 
Back
Top