And....here we have it....Winning again! US, China agree to reduce $370B trade deficit

Tony Stark said:
Its better than posting Trump is what voters wanted when that cleary isnt the case.
More...
Tony "Duly" Stark pulled out the 2 out 3 regurgitated lines out of his bag. How painful is butt hurtitus?

Are you going to post the 1st or 3rd line next?
 
WeToddDid2 said:
Tony "Duly" Stark pulled out the 2 out 3 regurgitated lines out of his bag. How painful is butt hurtitus?

Are you going to post the 1st or 3rd line next?
More...
Tell us again how the voters wanted trump (but hillary got millions more votes.)
 
tony how many times do i have to correct your out of context misrepresentations. There was banter... but when it mattered... I nailed both elections. You saw above I was the most accurate person in the country in 2012 because I said Hillary had a 1 to 2 point lead in the national voted but that Nate Silvers work showing she could lose in that scenari was very "tradeable".

.

and I got 2008 right as well.


Obama won by 7 in 2008. 53 to 46
Obama won by 4 in 2012.

here is what I said on ET on Nov. 5th --- in 2012 about polls and templates...


----
https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/romney-looks-like-the-next-pres.240772/page-335

polls slanted greater to the Dems than the 2008 the template are leftist frauds... and they should be chastised. This will include the crazy predictions made by nate silver.

polls with the 2008 template are leftists, fools, or blind.
even axelrod said last night they will not do as well as 2008.

poll between 2010 and 2008 are professional... perhaps a little partisan as they get closer to 2008.

polls with 2010... are perhaps a bit partisan to the Rs but smart.


but IMO

polls should slanted more to the Is and the Rs because that is what the turnout on Tuesday will teach us.

all these pollsters... underweighted the Is."






Tony Stark said:
"When Obama can't qualify for the ballot in a bunch of states - it will be hillary vs palin."-dumb ass birther jem



"jem is walking up the street to vote.
he then has a bunch of business things today and will then fund his trading account... for his future journal. he will then play golf he will then go with the kids and wife to a dinner place to celebrate

he will then returhn home, grab a beer and watch as the the media explains this surprise Romney victory..."-birther jem
More...
 
jem said:
tony how many times do i have to correct your out of context misrepresentations. There was banter... but when it mattered... I nailed both elections. You saw above I was the most accurate person in the country in 2012 because I said Hillary had a 1 to 2 point lead in the national voted but that Nate Silvers work showing she could lose in that scenari was very "tradeable".

.

and I got 2008 right as well.


Obama won by 7 in 2008. 53 to 46
Obama won by 4 in 2012.

here is what I said on ET on Nov. 5th --- in 2012 about polls and templates...


----
https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/romney-looks-like-the-next-pres.240772/page-335

polls slanted greater to the Dems than the 2008 the template are leftist frauds... and they should be chastised. This will include the crazy predictions made by nate silver.

polls with the 2008 template are leftists, fools, or blind.
even axelrod said last night they will not do as well as 2008.

poll between 2010 and 2008 are professional... perhaps a little partisan as they get closer to 2008.

polls with 2010... are perhaps a bit partisan to the Rs but smart.


but IMO

polls should slanted more to the Is and the Rs because that is what the turnout on Tuesday will teach us.

all these pollsters... underweighted the Is."
More...

1.I guess Im off your ignore list.

2.

"When Obama can't qualify for the ballot in a bunch of states - it will be hillary vs palin."-dumb ass birther jem



"jem is walking up the street to vote.
he then has a bunch of business things today and will then fund his trading account... for his future journal. he will then play golf he will then go with the kids and wife to a dinner place to celebrate

he will then returhn home, grab a beer and watch as the the media explains this surprise Romney victory..."-birther jem
 
The Boss

TZ8rvhC.gif
 
Optionpro007 said:
I am certain the Chinese government wants US buyers to like and keep buying China. Trump knows this too. Sorry that if a good and fair deal for the US goes through, t
More...
Optionpro007 said:
US, China agree to reduce $370B trade deficit


By Megan HenneyPublished May 19, 2018ChinaFOXBusiness

Trump is optimistic about getting trade deal with China: Larry Kudlow
National Economic Council Director Larry Kudlow discusses the ongoing trade talks between the U.S. and China.

The United States and China agreed to take steps to significantly reduce the $370 billion trade deficit between the two economic powerhouses by having Beijing purchase more goods, according to a joint statement released by the two nations on Saturday.

“There was a consensus on taking effective measures to substantially reduce the United States trade deficit in goods with China,” the statement read. “To meet the growing consumption needs of the Chinese people and the need for high-quality economic development, China will significantly increase purchases of United States goods and services.”

According to the White House, the U.S. will increase its agriculture and energy exports to China and will send a team of negotiators to Beijing to work out the details. It was unclear how much the deficit would be reduced by.

President Trump has been insistent about reducing the trade deficit -- which the White House has blamed for the loss of millions of U.S. jobs -- between the two countries. But when U.S. officials met with officials in Beijing last week, no deal was reached in large part because China refused a demand to cut the trade deficit by $200 billion within the next two years.

The president met with China’s Vice Premier Liu He at the White House on Tuesday afternoon, according to Trump’s chief economic adviser Larry Kudlow, who said there was “great interest” in further the negotiations.

The delegations, which included Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross and U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer, also discussed expanding trade in manufactured goods and services, as well as improving trade conditions in these areas.

Kudlow, a self-avowed free trade advocate, hinted earlier this week that conversations between the U.S. and China were moving in a direction that would eliminate trading barriers, like tariffs.

“Both sides agreed to encourage two-way investment and to strive to create a fair, level playing field for competition,” the statement read.
More...
Reality check 007


https://twitter.com/x/status/998510770001514496
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top