Analysis of Christopher Hitchen's argument against God

A good explanation of atheistic faith...





<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/5bVrafC1vi0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Lol. So this is what a message board looks like when creationists get hysterical.

You guys have made it quite obvious there is no real argument for your imaginary intelligent designer, other than needfull ignorance and antagonism toward science.


here ya go Jem repeat this 20 times a day....

"The answer of modern molecular biology to this much-debated question is categorical: chance, and chance alone, did it all, from primeval soup to man, with only natural selection to sift its effects. This affirmation now rests on overwhelming factual evidence."

Dr. Christian de Duve
Professor Emeritus
1974 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
 
Do you have an argument to make?

Quote from stu:

Lol. So this is what a message board looks like when creationists get hysterical.

You guys have made it quite obvious there is no real argument for your imaginary intelligent designer, other than needfull ignorance and antagonism toward science.


here ya go Jem repeat this 20 times a day....

"The answer of modern molecular biology to this much-debated question is categorical: chance, and chance alone, did it all, from primeval soup to man, with only natural selection to sift its effects. This affirmation now rests on overwhelming factual evidence."

Dr. Christian de Duve
Professor Emeritus
1974 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
 
Quote from OPTIONAL777:

I asked you first.

So, do you have an argument to make?
If you think the question is good enough for me surely it is good enough for you, no matter who asks it first.
So, do you have an argument to make or not?
 
Why are you evading the question?

Do you have any argument to make?

Quote from stu:

If you think the question is good enough for me surely it is good enough for you, no matter who asks it first.
So, do you have an argument to make or not?
 
Quote from OPTIONAL777:

Why are you evading the question?

Do you have any argument to make?

Ask yourself the same question. Why are you avoiding it?

Science is most certainly an argument.
Intelligent design is no argument at all.

So there, I've answered your question for both of us.

Hope that helps
 
Science without a proof is an argument, sure.

Design theory is an argument without a proof, sure.

Belief in the arguments lacking a proof such as something from nothing, and spontaneous life from an unproved soup is belief in science fiction. Defending said science fiction in a dogmatic fashion without questioning the assumptions of science is a religion.

If your mind was open, that should help.

Good luck with your personal faith in science fiction arguments lacking proof...



Quote from stu:

Ask yourself the same question. Why are you avoiding it?

Science is most certainly an argument.
Intelligent design is no argument at all.

So there, I've answered your question for both of us.

Hope that helps
 
Back
Top