Clearly Richard Dawkins would not have won Ben Stein's money...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlZtEjtlirc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlZtEjtlirc
Quote from stu:
Lol. So this is what a message board looks like when creationists get hysterical.
You guys have made it quite obvious there is no real argument for your imaginary intelligent designer, other than needfull ignorance and antagonism toward science.
here ya go Jem repeat this 20 times a day....
"The answer of modern molecular biology to this much-debated question is categorical: chance, and chance alone, did it all, from primeval soup to man, with only natural selection to sift its effects. This affirmation now rests on overwhelming factual evidence."
Dr. Christian de Duve
Professor Emeritus
1974 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
Quote from OPTIONAL777:
Why are you evading the question?
Do you have any argument to make?
Quote from stu:
Ask yourself the same question. Why are you avoiding it?
Science is most certainly an argument.
Intelligent design is no argument at all.
So there, I've answered your question for both of us.
Hope that helps