Analysis of Christopher Hitchen's argument against God
- Thread starter OPTIONAL777
- Start date
Lord K-Y,
it's not up to stu and I to disprove all your silly notions.
we just don't have that much time.
it's not up to stu and I to disprove all your silly notions.
we just don't have that much time.
What evidence do you have that you "know"?
otherwise it's just your opinion.
Quote from killthesunshine:
Lord K-Y,
it's not up to stu and I to disprove all your silly notions.
we just don't have that much time.
He claims to know. Do you claim to know as well?
what else do the voices in your head say?
Which God to you request to be disproved?
The one in your head, optional's head or the one in your neighbor's head?
Quote from killthesunshine:
Which God to you request to be disproved?
The one in your head, optional's head or the one in your neighbor's head?
I'm not asking for you to disprove anything.
I'm asking you for the evidence that stu and evidently you claim to "know".
evidence of 'what" you twit?
<object style="height: 390px; width: 640px"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/u-lKy8dsdqU?version=3"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/u-lKy8dsdqU?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="390"></object>
You asked me if I know. I said Sure. I gave you my answer. It's not a claim.
You say you're not asking me to disprove anything and I make no claims about my knowledge.
So why would you imagine there should be any reason for evidence of -not- when there is no evidence of -for- to begin with?
Beautifully done stu, dare i say touche!