Analysis of Christopher Hitchen's argument against God

The Jesus argument:

We don't know all the facts about everything = Jesus
If evolution is real then why are there still monkeys = Jesus
I don't think the big bang theory is valid = Jesus
Science Smiecnce = Jesus
The banana was designed to be easy to eat by man = Jesus
I don't know how I can order an ebook on Amazon and start reading it in 2 minutes = Jesus
There is no evidence for Jesus or God = Jesus
Who created god = Jesus
The earth is 6000 years old apx. according to the bible yet there are stars millions of light years away WTF = Jesus
There are god stories just like the Jesus story way before the Jesus story = Jesus
Where would man be without God = Jesus
It is impossible for the wankel engine to work, yet it does = Jesus
I get a funny feeling in my gut = Jesus
I'm not that good looking but get good looking girls = Jesus
Not believing in other gods is not the same = Jesus
There is only one god = Jesus
Who is that voice in my head = Jesus
Gravity isn't a theory, it's Gods hand on our head keeping us from flying off the earth = Jesus

****

Replace Jesus for the God of your choice for your specific religious argument.
 
Only someone who knows all things can claim with certainty there is or is not a God.

Is there someone who makes that claim? Who would that be? Would that person then not possess an attribute that is uniquely ascribed to God?

That person can certainly tell us NOW if the Higgs Boson exists too. Such a claim and proof of its existence would be child's play by comparison!!

Please person-who-is-all-knowing - tell us - does the Higgs Boson truly exist? Please provide the necessary proofs.

Thank you.
 
Quote from jem:



It seems clear that there is fine tuning, and you either need a tuner, who chooses the constants so that we arise, or you need a multiverse, and then we have to be in one of the universes where the constants are right for life.”



http://www.philosophypress.co.uk/?p=137

or the dozens of other quotes like the above he has been presented with..

Well in all honesty we can't very well be in and observe a universe that doesn't support life.
 
Where are those who claim absolute Certainty??

Where are the All-Knowing Ones??

Where is the simple proof or refutation of the existence of the Higgs Boson?!!!

If Certainty about God is a "10", the proofs for or against the Higgs Boson must rank a "1 or 2" against such level of Knowledge.

Where are you , O Wisest of The Wise?
 
Actually hitchens arguments always go , identify bad things done by those who claim to be religious or in the name of religion : therefore there is no God.

or

Hitchens anthropomophizing the concept of god which gives him a result he neither understands nor likes therefore: There is no such thing as God.

Only his first argument has any validity and then that relates to the behavior of "people" and has nothing to do with whether "God" exists or not.
 
Quote from OPTIONAL777:

AKA, double talk from stu...you don't even realize what a fanatic zealot you are, do you?

At least if you would admit to a lack of impartiality, admit to your own faith, there could be an honest discussion...but without your being honest about your own faith...there is just your own wiggling of a worm on a hot plate...
There would be no honesty and no honest discussion, in admitting to faith where there is non.

And having faith is quite clearly not making you at all impartial.
 
Why not stop all the ducking and diving and address the refutation you were given.

Quote from jem:
I started Stu out with a quote... I expected him to be able to explain. the biologist lectures for NASA spoke at UCSD and suggests that life could have come here from out of space.
but then Stu got emotional because he knows that if there is only one universe it does look fine tuned...
Bernard Carr is an astronomer at Queen Mary University, London. ...
But what it comes down to is that there are these physical constants that can’t be explained. It seems clear that there is fine tuning, and you either need a tuner, who chooses the constants so that we arise, or you need a multiverse, and then we have to be in one of the universes where the constants are right for life.”
http://www.philosophypress.co.uk/?p=137
or the dozens of other quotes like the above he has been presented with..
 
Quote from LORD KAL-EL:

Actually hitchens arguments always go , identify bad things done by those who claim to be religious or in the name of religion : therefore there is no God.

or

Hitchens anthropomophizing the concept of god which gives him a result he neither understands nor likes therefore: There is no such thing as God.

Only his first argument has any validity and then that relates to the behavior of "people" and has nothing to do with whether "God" exists or not.
Hitchens has often stated he finds no valid reason or moral argument to think why God should exist.

So there isn't even the necessity of any requirement to make the claim God doesn’t exist.
 
Quote from stu:

Hitchens has often stated he finds no valid reason or moral argument to think why God should exist.

So there isn't even the necessity of any requirement to make the claim God doesn’t exist.

Oh kinda like you, he doesn't have the balls to come out and say it just prolific writing and numerous books , speeches and debates implying it.
 
Quote from LORD KAL-EL:

Oh kinda like you, he doesn't have the balls to come out and say it just prolific writing and numerous books , speeches and debates implying it.

but you got the irrational brain to claim He does on no real evidence :D

you should be concerned you got some real squirrel running around in your head. :eek:
 
Back
Top