Just make a logical argument that my proposition is logically not possible...
Show me the math that Totality does not exist.
Show me the math that Totality does not exist.
Analysis of Christopher Hitchen's argument against God
- Thread starter OPTIONAL777
- Start date
What is there to refute with smthg that is everything known & unknown, possible & impossible all at same time?
I asked you to make a logical argument against my proposition, is that possible for you to do?
If you can't refute my proposition logically, than the proposition stands as a logical proposition...and you can accept or reject it on the basis of your own belief system, which is fine.
I have no problem with you taking faith in whatever you like, as long as your faith doesn't conflict with mine (which it doesn't, as Totality has within it atheistic thinking, theistic thinking, and agnostic thinking) and as long as your faith is not forced on me.
In answer to your question below, you are saying there is nothing to refute with my proposition, so I'll take that as you have no logical objection.
If you can't refute my proposition logically, than the proposition stands as a logical proposition...and you can accept or reject it on the basis of your own belief system, which is fine.
I have no problem with you taking faith in whatever you like, as long as your faith doesn't conflict with mine (which it doesn't, as Totality has within it atheistic thinking, theistic thinking, and agnostic thinking) and as long as your faith is not forced on me.
In answer to your question below, you are saying there is nothing to refute with my proposition, so I'll take that as you have no logical objection.
point me to your argument, i missed it. can i read it, do you know where it is quickly?
do you really believe you've proven logically the existence of God?
do you really believe you've proven logically the existence of God?
dead silence.
still waiting for your alleged unassailable God proposition
do you have one or is this just more proof of your nonsense
still waiting for your alleged unassailable God proposition
do you have one or is this just more proof of your nonsense
The argument is in this thread.
I believe I've made a logical proposition.
I believe I've made a logical proposition.
Quote from killthesunshine:
point me to your argument, i missed it. can i read it, do you know where it is quickly?
do you really believe you've proven logically the existence of God?
which page, don't make me wade thru 40+ pgs
i'll tear it to shreds
I propose that there is Totality as a logical statement. Totality always exists, even if there were nothing, there would be a Totality of nothing. God=Totality. Therefore, God exists.
this is it?
ok.
how do you define "Totality"?
does it go smthg like this:
Totality = All
God = Totality
therefore, God =All.
therefore, God exists.
?
Totality = All
God = Totality
therefore, God =All.
therefore, God exists.
?