Quote from DrEvil:
I'm not knocking your approach jd7419; however; I see no advantage in your approach vs not putting on the initial 400 shares, waiting till it "PROVES to me that my trade is right by moving up ..." and then putting down the full 5000.
Am I missing something?
Quote from ElCubano:
march 2000 in november they were already screaming blooody murder
Quote from jd7419:
God man I could give you a hundred setups but you would still lose. Anyway I will give you something better than a setup. I am a daytrader. When I enter say rimm for example on the long side with the intention of a 5000 share postion I will probe the position. So even if I love the setup I will only buy 400 shares. The stock will wiggle a little and once it PROVES to me that my trade is right by moving up I will add the whole position. If the trade of the 400 share probe does not prove right immediately I will exit the postion at the market right away. This whole decision process takes place in seconds and I do it over and over all day long, long and short. Essentially I want to be small when I am wrong and large when I am right. Tough concept for alot of traders to grasp
Quote from ProfitTakgFool:
This is the BIGGEST point trader miss right here. You don't EVER put your whole line on the trade until it proves to you it's going to work. You take nibbles here, nibbles there, and if it doesn't work you lose on a nibble or two. When it does work you win with a big chunk. Money Management is the most neglected aspect of trading. Most traders are typically under-capitalized so they don't have the luxury of taking a nibble. 400 shares on a RIMM trade is usually their entire line. If you're not funded properly think about going prop, or figure out some other way.
No setup posted here, but lots of substance for sure!