Quote from Spectra:
Check out this video on T&S aka 'tape'
http://puretick.com/video/tape0130
Yes, I saw that, and thank you -- and thanks to everyone else for their comments. But, not to beat a dead horse here, I'm not sure the answer has soaked through my thick skull quite yet, so bear with me while I take another pass at it.
I'm not suggesting that 500 lots is a consequential sum on the es -- I picked that number out of a hat as an example. So, for now, let's forget about the number. Let's just call it "n".
When on one's T&S window, it reads "N" contracts on the bid at 1440.50, say, my question is whether I am safe in assuming that this represents "selling pressure" -- however modest, or inconsequential that pressure may be.
Bear with me while I grind my way through this. In such a case, someone may have just had his/her "n" contract order to buy filled after letting it sit there on the bid for a few moments. That order to buy "n' contracts at the bid might have been filled by an equal and opposite order to sell "n" contracts on the bid, or it might have been filled by "x" number of smaller lot orders that, collectively, add up to "n" contracts.
So I guess it comes down this...
That order for "n" contracts, which had been sitting on the bid at 1440.50, would only be filled once the bid had moved down to 1440.25 and once the offer had also moved down a tick, to 1440.50. That order for "n" contracts, then, would show up as an order on the offer, and the opposing orders used to fill this "n" contract order would show as orders on the bid -- "hitting the bid".
So, bottom line, one is justified in assuming that when an order on the bid registers on the T&S window, this represents selling "pressure" (again, however inconsequential that pressure may be), and vice-versa for an order on the offer.
Whew. Anybody read this far? Have I got it right?