An avalanche of pullouts from the Paris Climate Agreement?
- Thread starter Tom B
- Start date
More countries will remove themselves from Paris Accord. Without the US, the Paris Accord has no reason for existence. They need our money. We finally have a leader.
Climate Change Hypocrites
6/6/2017 12:01:00 AM - Stephen Moore
Maybe the most laughable reaction to Donald Trump's pulling out of the Paris climate accord came from European and Chinese leaders who blasted Trump and America for "surrendering its world leadership" role. The sanctimonious leaders of Asian and European nations pledged to move full speed ahead on clean energy without the United States. Be my guest.
But we've been to this movie before. The Europeans were all in on the Kyoto Protocol deal back in 2005 -- an international treaty the U.S. rightly rejected. Euroland promised a massive shift to green energy and to abandon fossil fuels to dramatically reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. But guess what? The green energy revolution was a bust. None of these countries came close to meeting those targets. Now these nations, especially Germany, are moving away from the saintly clean energy sources.
They say they are solemnly committed to a new treaty -- but if they violated the last one, why would we believe them now?
Even more amazing and underreported is that the United States -- even though we did not make a pledge to reduce our greenhouse gases in accord with that treaty -- has reduced its carbon emissions more than some of the European signatories.
Contrary to the flood of insults directed at the Trump administration, the U.S. is not the bad actor on the world stage when it comes to environmental protection. We are the world leader in environmental stewardship, and our energy use, as a share of the economy, continues to shrink.
An even more preposterous claim is that China -- the largest polluter by far -- and India are moving away from fossil fuels and transitioning to wind and solar power.
No, they are not. Here is what The Wall Street Journal reported in a November story about China and India "doubling down" on fossil fuel use: "China's government said it would raise coal power capacity by as much as 20 percent by 2020, ensuring a continuing strong role for the commodity in the country's energy sector despite a pledge to bring down pollution levels. In a new five-year plan for electricity ... the National Energy Administration said it would raise coal-fired power capacity from around 900 gigawatts last year to as high as 1,100 gigawatts by 2020."
Wait. We are going to be lectured by these nations about saving the planet? This is like taking a lesson in personal hygiene from Pig-Pen (my favorite Peanuts character).
We should have learned by now that with foreign nations, you always have to watch what they do, not listen to what they say. China isn't interested in reducing pollution levels. It is hyper-focused on one goal: gaining global dominance in every industry and using the cheapest and most reliable energy sources possible to get there. China and Europe want the U.S. to transition to more expensive energy sources -- in no small part because they want to regain the competitiveness they lost due to their own green energy policies.
The press is also having a field day with the story that Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla and SolarCity, has resigned from a Trump economic advisory council out of protest. But Musk, according to the Los Angeles Times, has received almost $5 billion in government subsidies. SolarCity and Tesla are likely out of business without all the taxpayer-funded green handouts. Why doesn't the press report that Musk has a multibillion-dollar personal stake in global warming?
America has at least 200 years of shale gas, which is clean burning, efficient and made in America. We have 500 years of coal, and the emissions of pollutants from coal plants have fallen by more than 50 percent in recent decades. Clean coal is here, and rather than shut down this industry and put tens of thousands more coal miners in unemployment lines, we should allow technology and innovation to make it cleaner still through gasification, carbon capture and so on.
Because of stunning advances in drilling technologies, the value of American oil, gas and coal resources that are currently recoverable is estimated at near $50 trillion -- which is more than double our national debt. The Paris climate accord would require America to keep this massive treasure chest of resources in the ground, never to be used.
Sadly, President Barack Obama negotiated a treaty that accommodated the economic interests of our rivals and put America last. Trump's gutsy decision puts America on the path to becoming the global energy superpower in the decades to come and puts American workers first.
https://townhall.com/columnists/stephenmoore/2017/06/06/climate-change-hypocrites-n2336796
6/6/2017 12:01:00 AM - Stephen Moore
Maybe the most laughable reaction to Donald Trump's pulling out of the Paris climate accord came from European and Chinese leaders who blasted Trump and America for "surrendering its world leadership" role. The sanctimonious leaders of Asian and European nations pledged to move full speed ahead on clean energy without the United States. Be my guest.
But we've been to this movie before. The Europeans were all in on the Kyoto Protocol deal back in 2005 -- an international treaty the U.S. rightly rejected. Euroland promised a massive shift to green energy and to abandon fossil fuels to dramatically reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. But guess what? The green energy revolution was a bust. None of these countries came close to meeting those targets. Now these nations, especially Germany, are moving away from the saintly clean energy sources.
They say they are solemnly committed to a new treaty -- but if they violated the last one, why would we believe them now?
Even more amazing and underreported is that the United States -- even though we did not make a pledge to reduce our greenhouse gases in accord with that treaty -- has reduced its carbon emissions more than some of the European signatories.
Contrary to the flood of insults directed at the Trump administration, the U.S. is not the bad actor on the world stage when it comes to environmental protection. We are the world leader in environmental stewardship, and our energy use, as a share of the economy, continues to shrink.
An even more preposterous claim is that China -- the largest polluter by far -- and India are moving away from fossil fuels and transitioning to wind and solar power.
No, they are not. Here is what The Wall Street Journal reported in a November story about China and India "doubling down" on fossil fuel use: "China's government said it would raise coal power capacity by as much as 20 percent by 2020, ensuring a continuing strong role for the commodity in the country's energy sector despite a pledge to bring down pollution levels. In a new five-year plan for electricity ... the National Energy Administration said it would raise coal-fired power capacity from around 900 gigawatts last year to as high as 1,100 gigawatts by 2020."
Wait. We are going to be lectured by these nations about saving the planet? This is like taking a lesson in personal hygiene from Pig-Pen (my favorite Peanuts character).
We should have learned by now that with foreign nations, you always have to watch what they do, not listen to what they say. China isn't interested in reducing pollution levels. It is hyper-focused on one goal: gaining global dominance in every industry and using the cheapest and most reliable energy sources possible to get there. China and Europe want the U.S. to transition to more expensive energy sources -- in no small part because they want to regain the competitiveness they lost due to their own green energy policies.
The press is also having a field day with the story that Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla and SolarCity, has resigned from a Trump economic advisory council out of protest. But Musk, according to the Los Angeles Times, has received almost $5 billion in government subsidies. SolarCity and Tesla are likely out of business without all the taxpayer-funded green handouts. Why doesn't the press report that Musk has a multibillion-dollar personal stake in global warming?
America has at least 200 years of shale gas, which is clean burning, efficient and made in America. We have 500 years of coal, and the emissions of pollutants from coal plants have fallen by more than 50 percent in recent decades. Clean coal is here, and rather than shut down this industry and put tens of thousands more coal miners in unemployment lines, we should allow technology and innovation to make it cleaner still through gasification, carbon capture and so on.
Because of stunning advances in drilling technologies, the value of American oil, gas and coal resources that are currently recoverable is estimated at near $50 trillion -- which is more than double our national debt. The Paris climate accord would require America to keep this massive treasure chest of resources in the ground, never to be used.
Sadly, President Barack Obama negotiated a treaty that accommodated the economic interests of our rivals and put America last. Trump's gutsy decision puts America on the path to becoming the global energy superpower in the decades to come and puts American workers first.
https://townhall.com/columnists/stephenmoore/2017/06/06/climate-change-hypocrites-n2336796
Laugh if you want, but it's already getting warmer where I live. But then again it could just be Chinese Co2 pollution blowing over. I bought a Co2 detector and you can see it all over my trees. It's even coming out of my dogs mouth, especially the last few hot days since we started emitting it again now that it is no longer against the law to pollute all we want. Could be he just needs water, but I'm not giving him any until we get a new head of EPA, that guy doesn't look like an EPA head to me. As a matter of fact, nothing looks like it use to look before Trump.
It is getting warmer where I am at too. Then again, it is almost summer.
At least you are not denying it. Some republicans are still wearing coats because they don't want to admit it is getting warmer.
‘Global Warming’ Is a Myth, Say 58 Scientific Papers in 2017
In other words, the so-called “Consensus” on global warming is a massive lie
"... In other words, the so-called “Consensus” on global warming is a massive lie. And Donald Trump was quite right to quit the Paris agreement which pretended that the massive lie was true..."
The Climate Change Agreement, as most here understand, is just the first step in signing on to a one world government that is unelected by the people... and man are the Globalists pissed at Patriot Trump.
https://www.infowars.com/global-warming-is-a-myth-say-58-scientific-papers-in-2017/
In other words, the so-called “Consensus” on global warming is a massive lie
"... In other words, the so-called “Consensus” on global warming is a massive lie. And Donald Trump was quite right to quit the Paris agreement which pretended that the massive lie was true..."
The Climate Change Agreement, as most here understand, is just the first step in signing on to a one world government that is unelected by the people... and man are the Globalists pissed at Patriot Trump.
https://www.infowars.com/global-warming-is-a-myth-say-58-scientific-papers-in-2017/
Last edited:
Or it could be summer coming.
The summers are getting hotter. When I was a kid there was no such thing as a hot day, just a good day for swimming. We could run in it, we could play in it, all it ever did was make popsicles taste better. Now years later, the summers get so hot I need air conditioning and a hat to keep my head from burning. I don't think these young kids today realize just how serious global warming gets.