An Accused Sexual Predator in the White House

[gwb-trading]

Curious GWB-Trading is not the brightest of the right though he is on this site.

The Dunning Kruger effect is incredibly strong with him.

When it is so provably not true and that would be enough to give an honest man pause to apologise for wasting time, he Kellyannes off to something that is still not what he asserted.

A one eyed George the monkey falling from his tree grasping wildly in the hope he might touch a branch. Then if his does not die, "Yeah, I meant to do that".

Bonus feature:

It appears that you have nothing to say about the fact that the term sexual assault appears dozens of times in the Jones vs. Clinton legal documents. The best you can do is re-direct with insults and cartoons.

 

[Slartibartfast]

It appears that you have nothing to say about the fact that the term sexual assault appears dozens of times in the Jones vs. Clinton legal documents. The best you can do is re-direct with insults and cartoons.

Oh Kellyanne or is it furious George?

You have now flung your poop "assault" across two threads. Here is proof, no, here it his, try this.. aping the re-framing you see on TV with Kellyanne.

I am trading now, if I have time to waste later... but like the clip below explained for a child to understand. You might learn something.

Not that I want you to get even better at what you do already but so 'they' can see your game.

 

[gwb-trading]

Oh Kellyanne or is it furious George?

View attachment 178574

You are now flung your poop "assault" across two threads. Here is proof, no, here it his, try this.. aping the re-framing you see on TV with Kellyanne.

I am trading now, if I have time to waste later... but like the clip below explained for a child to understand. You might learn something.

Obviously you still have not searched for the word "assault" in the Jones vs. Clinton legal documents. Go fling your poop somewhere else...

 

[exGOPer]

Obviously you still have not searched for the word "assault" in the Jones vs. Clinton legal documents. Go fling your poop somewhere else...

Every one of those keywords there DENY assault took place, you were asked to find where assault actually happened, not tell us what didn't happen. If the documents had murder in it, you would be accusing Clintons of murder.

 

[exGOPer]

It appears that you have nothing to say about the fact that the term sexual assault appears dozens of times in the Jones vs. Clinton legal documents. The best you can do is re-direct with insults and cartoons.

Nobody asked about the TERM appearing there, what was asked is that the actions be characterized as assault by authorities which it was not.

 

[exGOPer]

And to think all the dirt you are trying to dish occurred BEFORE the election. How did that strategy work out for you?

Putin wins, Mueller will decide.

 

[WeToddDid2]

Putin wins, Mueller will decide.

Mueller decided there was no evidence of Russian collusion whatsoever.

Wrong again!

 

[LacesOut]

Mueller decided there was no evidence of Russian collusion whatsoever.

Wrong again!

Dude it would take you all day to point out all the times Groper was wrong in the last 2 years. Definitely do it!

 

[RRY16]

Dude it would take you all day to point out all the times I was wrong in the last 2 years. Definitely do me!

 

[exGOPer]

Mueller decided there was no evidence of Russian collusion whatsoever.

Wrong again!

Quote him where he said that, fake news peddling cloaca at it again.