An Accused Sexual Predator in the White House

upload_2017-10-8_16-54-21.png
 
One of my customers knows a lady lawyer that was working for Trump. He grabbed her ass, she slapped him, he fired her and then spread lies about her.

The man is an ignorant thin skinned egotistical moronic low class pig.
 
futurecurrents said:
One of my customers knows a lady lawyer that was working for Trump. He grabbed her ass, she slapped him, he fired her and then spread lies about her.

The man is an ignorant thin skinned egotistical moronic low class pig.
More...
If that is true, then you are correct. So why do you and your buddies like exGROPer approve of this behavior when Bill Clinton does it?
 
gwb-trading said:
Try running the web page search for "assault" on the text of the legal decision --
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/pjones/docs/order040198.htm

Enjoy your dozens of matches.
More...

Enjoy what?

The judge is DISMISSING the case citing those laws, not endorsing it.

"the Court rejects plaintiff's contention that this case involves equal protection claims based not only on sexual harassment, but also on sexual assault and offensive conduct in violation of laws"

"While the alleged incident in the hotel, if true, was certainly boorish and offensive, the Court has already found that the Governor's alleged conduct does not constitute sexual assault."

"While the Court will certainly agree that plaintiffs allegations describe offensive conduct, the Court, as previously noted, has found that the Governor's alleged conduct does not constitute sexual assault. Rather, the conduct as alleged by plaintiff describes a mere sexual proposition or encounter, albeit an odious one, that was relatively brief in duration, did not involve any coercion or threats of reprisal, and was abandoned as soon as plaintiff made clear that the advance was not welcome"


Thanks for debunking yourself again.
 
exGOPer said:
Enjoy what?

The judge is DISMISSING the case citing those laws, not endorsing it.

"the Court rejects plaintiff's contention that this case involves equal protection claims based not only on sexual harassment, but also on sexual assault and offensive conduct in violation of laws"

"While the alleged incident in the hotel, if true, was certainly boorish and offensive, the Court has already found that the Governor's alleged conduct does not constitute sexual assault."

"While the Court will certainly agree that plaintiffs allegations describe offensive conduct, the Court, as previously noted, has found that the Governor's alleged conduct does not constitute sexual assault. Rather, the conduct as alleged by plaintiff describes a mere sexual proposition or encounter, albeit an odious one, that was relatively brief in duration, did not involve any coercion or threats of reprisal, and was abandoned as soon as plaintiff made clear that the advance was not welcome"


Thanks for debunking yourself again.
More...

Once again -- Your claim was that Bill Clinton was never sued for sexual assault. You said "name just one case" where he was sued. I demonstrated clearly one case where he was sued for sexual assault. Yes -- as I mentioned in my summary the case went forward on the basis of the sexual harassment claim.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top