Amy Coney Barrett - let the games begin

Some dems already planning on some future games with Amy Barrett.

She’s a Justice for now, but we can impeach Amy Coney Barrett — if the Democrats are brave


https://www.independent.co.uk/voice...ustice-scotus-impeach-democrats-b1351458.html


Read the article next time...


Longtime Congressional scholar Norm Ornstein has provided the best advice to the Democratic Party at this juncture: “If Amy Coney Barrett goes on the Court and immediately votes for PA voter suppression, she should quickly be impeached. Trump asked her openly to act to tilt the scales of the election.”

it is an author claiming the Dems should try and impeach her, no Dem has made this a real position.

You got suckered in by the headline.
 
Read the article next time...


Longtime Congressional scholar Norm Ornstein has provided the best advice to the Democratic Party at this juncture: “If Amy Coney Barrett goes on the Court and immediately votes for PA voter suppression, she should quickly be impeached. Trump asked her openly to act to tilt the scales of the election.”

it is an author claiming the Dems should try and impeach her, no Dem has made this a real position.

You got suckered in by the headline.

You sound like you are on the rag or looking for something to be right about after a long dry spell.

Sorry though. This is an atmosphere that is littered with lefty clowns suggesting/calling for impeachment of Barrett now or at some point in the near future, regardless of how that article that I linked may or may not have unfolded. You may have even read over on Salon, Huffpo, or Mother Jones, that there were also calls to impeach Kavanaugh even after he was confirmed but you defensively rise to slough off suggestions that your ilk might resort to that type of thing.

Lots of lefty threats floating around regarding impeaching Barrett and Kavanaugh. Take some Midol and read up a bit.

Amy Coney Barrett hit with impeachment calls over Pennsylvania election case
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/oct/27/amy-coney-barrett-hit-impeachment-calls-over-penns/
 
Last edited:
Only a crazy lefty who denies who he is a lefty...
Would look at the murder of a human being and hold it out as virtue.

You can be for abortion... the killing of the not yet born... fine.

But.. to act like its the sign of better morality..
You are a lunatic. (particularly if the mothers life is not in danger).
its a choice, its not superior morality.


Were the Romans even more moral because they practiced infanticide?
Cmon at some point... you got to get off your liberal high horse and realize
abortion is tolerated killing of humans.

Fuck off with your superstitious religious bs. Providing safe, legal abortions in the appropriate circumstances is a virtue. Fetuses are not humans, and abortions are not murders. Your thinking is so rigid on every topic it's scary, and you're not smart enough to know when to mind your own business.
 
Last edited:
Except your party does not consider abortion to be murder in all cases....

So it was never about Chrsitian beliefs and morals because you cannot condemn abortion based on some moral high ground but then say it is ok in cases of rape or incest and then be fine with adultery.

This is why the GOP arguments fail at the legal level because it is based on pure hypocrisy

He's obviously a nut anytime I give him credit for some ability to use critical thinking skills he goes off the rails again. I am happy to live in a country that decided a long time ago that safe, legal abortions in the right circumstances were good for our country, and that often the mother and her doctor were in the best situation to evaluate the options. Not some superstitious people who take religion to extremes and believe they have a say in the life of strangers based on their moral code.
 
I see no reason for "everything the same" unless you somehow think the US is incapable of roughly matching Canada's experience in the same time period. I suppose you could make an argument that Clinton is as useless as Trump ( I'm not making that argument ); but any kind of rational decent leader would have been far better then Trump.

Examples of why I think this : resources spent on unnecessary trade war actions, lack of real progress on upgraded universal health care, unnecessary cheerleading from the top on ethnic rifts, tax cuts that were too top heavy in nature, extremely poor Covid response, and I really don't think a $1 trillion plus deficit pre-Covid was necessary.

With respect to the three judges, the last one is highly questionable. Normally, I'd be supportive of promoting a career woman, but on closer inspection ( I looked at an article yesterday ) she's almost the "anti-woman" in nature, more at home in the 1950s then modern day USA. She's anti-abortion on a fairly extreme level, protects the rights of felons to own guns, and sided heavily on the side of a college rapist. She was also involved in questionable actions when Bush got elected ( which may be the real catalyst for Trump picking her; a judge with a record of partisan decisions ). I'm no expert on American law, but I'm not impressed with this women at all it smells of dirty politics. It really doesn't matter to me personally, but if she starts siding on some controversial decisions in the next few years it will be obvious she's lying now about her ability to be impartial and respect the supposed nature of the role.

First, we're not going to be able to successfully argue whether Trump was better than Clinton would have been because the second never happened, nor will happen. So its just speculation and opinion.

The second (about ACB) is also subjective. You find her detestable, I do not.

I remain pleased that Trump got three judges in. Now, when Biden wins, I can feel better about that and the fact that we can move on. If Biden goes down the lunatic route of "packing the court", this will just mean the next time Republicans get in they'll add even more judges and the fall of the SCOTUS will ultimately be contributed to the time we went ahead to "pack the court". But I will be long gone by that point.
 
I did not say murder... moron.

You don't even have the brain power to understand the simple concept I pointed out.

If killing animals is not morally superior.
Certainly killing a fetus is not a morally superior position.
This argument has nothin to do with religion.
Its basic human nature.
You are just too bound by your own stupidity to even contemplate it.
You are forced by your own stupidity to attack me instead of accept this very basic point.

You may find it allowable, but don't even pretend to pretend your position is morally superior.


Fuck off with your superstitious religious bs. Providing safe, legal abortions in the appropriate circumstances is a virtue. Fetuses are not humans, and abortions are not murders. Your thinking is so rigid on every topic it's scary, and you're not smart enough to know when to mind your own business.
 
Back
Top