Amy Coney Barrett - let the games begin

[vanzandt]

 

[Wallet]

View attachment 242488

No it’s not.

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

For the Tards here, I am going to shamelessly offer up the obvious reminder that:

HILLARY CLINTON'S THIRD SUPREME COURT JUSTICE PICK WAS NOT CONFIRMED TODAY.

Although in a different twist of fate it could have gone that way.

You are welcome for that history lesson.

 

[vanzandt]

For those who claimed on here that getting 2 or 3 Supreme Court judges nominated would make the whole thing worth it, that is apparently the only "positive" you'll get. You'll get the judges, and then see Democrats take everything in the election. You've gotten the worst Covid experience in the Western World, a huge federal debt load under Trump that must be paid off with higher taxes, no Wall of note, highest trade deficit in recent history, worst social conflicts in decades, and your health care system isn't fixed.

Congratulations MoneyLessMatthew ( and others ) on getting what you wanted !!! Hope that Supreme Court changes your life to make up for all the other shit going on. I suppose some might say higher stock markets but in reality such moves are cyclical in nature and have very little to do with politics.

 

[Nine_Ender]

I know you like your cartoonists...

I'm trying to envision one. A (cartoon) regarding 15 justices on the court lol.

One of em will come up with it. I can't think of anything creative atm.

Just seems like the Republicans can't / don't want to win this election, so they are rushing in as much damage as they can in the last two months. That is after all Trump's thing, destroying things but claiming a cut for branding it before it goes under. Maybe you should rename your country TUSA and then file for bankruptcy .

 

[Buy1Sell2]

For the Tards here, I am going to shamelessly offer up the obvious reminder that:

HILLARY CLINTON'S THIRD SUPREME COURT JUSTICE PICK WAS NOT CONFIRMED TODAY.

Although in a different twist of fate it could have gone that way.

You are welcome for that history lesson.

We really dodged a bullet in 2016. The country was that close to total destruction just as it is now with NoBiden. One thing I do find interesting though is that there were 4 states that Trump lost by a total of 93k votes and so 2016 could have actually been a huge landslide for Trump. Those 4 states could flip to Trump in 2020.

 

[Buy1Sell2]

For the Tards here, I am going to shamelessly offer up the obvious reminder that:

HILLARY CLINTON'S THIRD SUPREME COURT JUSTICE PICK WAS NOT CONFIRMED TODAY.

Although in a different twist of fate it could have gone that way.

You are welcome for that history lesson.

Yep, the court could now be 7-2 Anti-American to Pro-American.

 

[El OchoCinco]

If the dems were so worried about Supreme Court they should have won the 2016 election or retaken the Senate in 2018.

I think Biden visited Pennsylvania more times this past week than Hillary visited PA, MI and WI combined in 2016. That is where she lost the election which was being handed to her.

HRC's supposedly intelligent campaign manager lost to a ditzy airhead who won with lies haha.

2016: How to Lose an Election

 

[Tsing Tao]

For those who claimed on here that getting 2 or 3 Supreme Court judges nominated would make the whole thing worth it, that is apparently the only "positive" you'll get. You'll get the judges, and then see Democrats take everything in the election. You've gotten the worst Covid experience in the Western World, a huge federal debt load under Trump that must be paid off with higher taxes, no Wall of note, highest trade deficit in recent history, worst social conflicts in decades, and your health care system isn't fixed.

Congratulations MoneyLessMatthew ( and others ) on getting what you wanted !!! Hope that Supreme Court changes your life to make up for all the other shit going on. I suppose some might say higher stock markets but in reality such moves are cyclical in nature and have very little to do with politics.

That's OK, I'll take it.

If Hillary had won, COVID wouldn't have been as deadly because it wouldn't have. No way they'd shut the economy down in an election year with her. And she'd have all the cover from the media over it.

We'd still have no wall, still have the highest trade deficit, but you're right - the social conflicts wouldn't have happened because the groups pushing BLM and Antifa wouldn't have funded their actions. And health care would still be broken.

So we have everything the same, but three justices. All worth it.

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

If the dems were so worried about Supreme Court they should have won the 2016 election or retaken the Senate in 2018.

Going back further, they should have gotten Ruthie to retire when the dems controlled the Senate under Obama- early on. She was of advanced age already and had a wide range of health problems that were not going to improve but she got caught up in the cult status that was building around her and assumed that Hillary would win after Obama so she could play around longer.

Losing 'her seat" to a conservative was just a result of her own personal greed- putting her own puffed up rock star status ahead of the continuation of the principles she allegedly wanted to see furthered. She had a good run, it was time to step down. The dems may argue that they could not get her to step down so it is not their fault. Well, okay then, that just makes my point. Ruthie was just functioning as a selfish shit then.