I don't think anyone here is arguing against less commissions and fees.
That said, I would hold off judgement until you get a Feb 1 (or later) daily statement.
Personally, I don't trade micros very often. The more important issue is number of ticks needed for a NET breakeven trade, not the nominal dollar amounts.
I too use AMP/SIERRA/CQG.
I am up in the air regarding Teton... The CQG credentials are usable with many platforms, including Tradingview. There is value to having this access, which is lost with the AMP/Sierra/Denali/Teton setup. Additionally, the Denali feed (afaik) requires payment directly to Sierra, rather than taken from the trading account. I prefer to not have to think about this mundane yet crucial, kind of stuff.
I notice NT brokerage lists .61 per side for index micros, with a lifetime NT license.
That said, I would hold off judgement until you get a Feb 1 (or later) daily statement.
Personally, I don't trade micros very often. The more important issue is number of ticks needed for a NET breakeven trade, not the nominal dollar amounts.
I too use AMP/SIERRA/CQG.
I am up in the air regarding Teton... The CQG credentials are usable with many platforms, including Tradingview. There is value to having this access, which is lost with the AMP/Sierra/Denali/Teton setup. Additionally, the Denali feed (afaik) requires payment directly to Sierra, rather than taken from the trading account. I prefer to not have to think about this mundane yet crucial, kind of stuff.
I notice NT brokerage lists .61 per side for index micros, with a lifetime NT license.
Last edited: