In four months the debate over America's Fiscal cliff will come to a crescendo, and if Goldman is correct (and in this case it likely is), it will probably be resolved in some sort of compromise, but not before the market swoons in a replica of the August 2011 pre- and post-debt ceiling fiasco: after all politicians only act when they (and their more influential, read richer, voters and lobbyists) see one or two 0's in their 401(k)s get chopped off. But while the Fiscal cliff is unlikely to be a key point of contention far past December, another cliff is only starting to be appreciated, let alone priced in: America's Demographic cliff, which in a decade or two will put Japan's ongoing demographic crunch to shame, and with barely 2 US workers for every retired person in 2035, we can see why both presidential candidates are doing their darnedest to skirt around the key issue that is at stake not only now, be every day hence.http://www.zerohedge.com/news/ameri...-coming-and-all-future-presidential-elections
sobering stuff IMHOAccording to the latest Social Security and Medicare Board of Trustees 2012 Annual Reports Social Security now pays out more than it takes in
Even if uncle sam didn't have any fiscal problems, this poses significant challenges .
Even if you have money to spend as a senior, you are dependent upon younger generations to provide you with the services you need.
Since the proportion of those younger than 65 is expected to shrink.
There will be more competition for the producers wares in the future. (esp if the indolent society keeps increasing)
So in effect you are in a competition with your cohorts as to your relative as well as absolute wealth position.