American companies are hereby ordered to immediately start looking for an alternative to China,

Baron has them.
Send your money, and get the fuck out of here, retard...

I would only banish you from P&R - you can continue posting in trading related forums as I imagine you might have some knowledge about something other than the crack of your own ass...
might need to just use your other pseudos (Really Really Young 16) to jackoff with your libtard buddies...

You're with your dwarf on an expired green card, Lucrum. Baron doesn't have a pic of your docs.
 
Last edited:
I'm sure he's just saying that because everyone is against him. If you're long the market you're long Trump. He absolutely needs to keep the market propped to win re-election. Unlike Obama, nobody likes him, but he can deliver. If the market tanks, the only way he'll win is if the democratic nomintee is Michael Avenatti.
 
I'm sure he's just saying that because everyone is against him. If you're long the market you're long Trump. He absolutely needs to keep the market propped to win re-election. Unlike Obama, nobody likes him, but he can deliver. If the market tanks, the only way he'll win is if the democratic nomintee is Michael Avenatti.

Not necessarily. For a risk off macro view Trump has been the best thing ever.
 
All relative. 3% when SPX@1000 or 1% when SPX@3000.
Comparing apples to giraffes. Like I have said many times percentages matter. Not points. Not starting or ending points other than time periods.

So the cumulative percentage return is 47.6% during Obama years compared to tRump's (current) 26.7% over the same elapsed time in office. See link:

https://www.macrotrends.net/2482/sp500-performance-by-president

And as it shows the full cumulative percentage return is 175.9% during Obama's time so tRump's got so catching up to do and then some. Hey does the fake media know about this?
 
tRump market timing

" .... a great time to start a mortgage company,..."

said in ........ 2006

:D
Actually true, it was the people who borrowed and the people who lent that were hurt. Those who had a mortgage company and package loans to others were printing money back then.
 
Comparing apples to giraffes. Like I have said many times percentages matter. Not points. Not starting or ending points other than time periods.

So the cumulative percentage return is 47.6% during Obama years compared to tRump's (current) 26.7% over the same elapsed time in office. See link:

https://www.macrotrends.net/2482/sp500-performance-by-president

And as it shows the full cumulative percentage return is 175.9% during Obama's time so tRump's got so catching up to do and then some. Hey does the fake media know about this?

Talk about comparing apples to giraffes... Obama showed up in a market that had been hammered down, and Trump after 7 years of bullmarket, quite different upside on both timestamps
 
Back
Top