"Declinism's Fifth Wave"
"That Used to Be Us is a co-production by a pundit and a professor, an unusual combination. Journalists write the first draft of history, say, on the Arab Spring. Taking a snapshot, they bet that the picture will reveal the pattern, and the particular the larger truth. Academics write the second and third drafts. They have the advantage of hindsight and a much wider dataset. So a reporter enthusing about Bastille Day in 1789 could not have known that the democratic revolution would throw up a Napoleon ten years later; a historian does. How, then, shall the twain ever meet? In Friedman and Mandelbaumâs venture, they do.
"Journalist Thomas Friedman presumably took on the reportage and the rewrite in this book. It has the same fast-paced tempo and bubbly tone as did his Hot, Flat and Crowded. Michael Mandelbaum, a political scientist with a wide historical range, must have been in charge of the broader analytical perspective. This division of labor works quite nicely. On the one hand, there is the journalistâs instant insight, feeding on anecdote and atmosphere. So: âAt the worst point of the subprime crisis, Tom asked his friend...â On the other, we get the academicâs âyes, butâ that is steeped in âweâve been there before.â (Truth in reviewing: I have known the authors for ages, ever since I met Mandelbaum at Harvard.)
"The United States now faces its fifth wave of Declinism, that sinking feeling that the countryâs best days are over. The first wave rolled across America with the âSputnik Shockâ of 1957, when Little Johnny was said to have fallen behind Little Ivan in the Three Rs. That wave crested in John F. Kennedyâs 1960 campaign against Richard Nixon. JFK rode all the way to the White House on a non-existent âmissile gapâ that supposedly presaged Americaâs demise at the hands of the Soviet Union. "
Article continues...
http://www.the-american-interest.com/article.cfm?piece=1170
"That Used to Be Us is a co-production by a pundit and a professor, an unusual combination. Journalists write the first draft of history, say, on the Arab Spring. Taking a snapshot, they bet that the picture will reveal the pattern, and the particular the larger truth. Academics write the second and third drafts. They have the advantage of hindsight and a much wider dataset. So a reporter enthusing about Bastille Day in 1789 could not have known that the democratic revolution would throw up a Napoleon ten years later; a historian does. How, then, shall the twain ever meet? In Friedman and Mandelbaumâs venture, they do.
"Journalist Thomas Friedman presumably took on the reportage and the rewrite in this book. It has the same fast-paced tempo and bubbly tone as did his Hot, Flat and Crowded. Michael Mandelbaum, a political scientist with a wide historical range, must have been in charge of the broader analytical perspective. This division of labor works quite nicely. On the one hand, there is the journalistâs instant insight, feeding on anecdote and atmosphere. So: âAt the worst point of the subprime crisis, Tom asked his friend...â On the other, we get the academicâs âyes, butâ that is steeped in âweâve been there before.â (Truth in reviewing: I have known the authors for ages, ever since I met Mandelbaum at Harvard.)
"The United States now faces its fifth wave of Declinism, that sinking feeling that the countryâs best days are over. The first wave rolled across America with the âSputnik Shockâ of 1957, when Little Johnny was said to have fallen behind Little Ivan in the Three Rs. That wave crested in John F. Kennedyâs 1960 campaign against Richard Nixon. JFK rode all the way to the White House on a non-existent âmissile gapâ that supposedly presaged Americaâs demise at the hands of the Soviet Union. "
Article continues...
http://www.the-american-interest.com/article.cfm?piece=1170