Amazingly Trump's lawyer paying Stormy off is on Fox news

[Tsing Tao]

Ah, yes, there's that bovine fragrance of which you speak. You conveniently pick and choose what to "believe" despite pretty much the same standard of evidence. And judging by your ad hominem, you seem a tad affected...

View attachment 182598

My ad hominem? I tried to talk civilly to you about the subject, but as is usually the case, you chose to go down the road of snark and insults simply because you don't agree with my point of view. This is usually how folks on the left operate when met with opinions that don't align with their own.

As I have offered you before, we can talk civilly or we can be shits to each other. Really is no matter to me.

Copying gifs from other posters in a lame attempt to continue the snark doesn't change that fact.

 

[Slartibartfast]

Ah, yes, there's that bovine fragrance of which you speak. You conveniently pick and choose what to "believe" despite pretty much the same standard of evidence. And judging by your ad hominem, you seem a tad affected...

View attachment 182598

Tsing Like Tom B and Jem are just DK effect retards. No surprise that they have concentrated here on ET in politics.

Can I afford that watch of yours now Tom B? (and I have a bad flu).

Maybe later today then.



Non-traders on a trading.. FFS.

 

[Tsing Tao]

Tsing Like Tom B and Jem are just DK effect retards. No surprise that they have concentrated here on ET in politics.

Can I afford that watch of yours now Tom B? (and I have a bad flu).

Maybe later today then.

View attachment 182600

Non-traders on a trading.. FFS.

Yet you obsess over these folks you have on ignore repeatedly.

 

[Tom B]

Still can't quite give up the ghost, can you?

Wrong again. BTW, why didn't the democrats reinstitute Glass-Steagall during the Obama years?

 

[Tsing Tao]

Wrong again. BTW, why didn't the democrats reinstitute Glass-Steagall during the Obama years?

Let's watch the dodge in real time.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

I tried to talk civilly to you about the subject, but as is usually the case, you chose to go down the road of snark and insults simply because you don't agree with my point of view.

Whenever I point to a hypocrisy on your part, it's snark to you. You sound as defensive as the turd whose honor and innocence you go out of your way to defend, Stormy Daniels notwithstanding. I can see why he appeals to you, Stormy Daniels notwithstanding.

 

[Tsing Tao]

I'm just surprised the lengths you have gone to defend your turd of choice in your past posts, giving him (it) all manner of benefits of the doubt. Coprophilia?

Right, assume the worst. Meanwhile, you will politically defend, tooth and nail, the man you supposedly consider to be a turd even as the gathering circumstantial evidence against him approaches critical mass.

Please tell us more of this bovine excrement about which you seem to be expert.

Ah yes, this is not snark at all. Just pointing stuff out.

No one is fooled by your horseshit except your tosser buddies, and even they know you're full of it, they're just looking for the reach around.

Someone who points out all the issues on one side of the aisle and lets them all go on the other side of the aisle, and then tries to point out when others are being hypocritical is the very personification of hypocrisy.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

Let's watch the dodge in real time.

Seriously, that's your response? Meanwhile Trump is looking to reduce financial regulation even more? This being the guy you voted for? And you're still mad at Bill Clinton for the deregulation added by Republicans at the last minute during his lame duck session?

Do you even read your own posts for continuity?

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/03/business/dealbook/trump-congress-financial-regulations.html

 

[Tsing Tao]

Seriously, that's your response? Meanwhile Trump is looking to reduce financial regulation even more? This being the guy you voted for? And you're still mad at Bill Clinton?

View attachment 182603

Do you even read your own posts for continuity?

Note to Tom - see? Ignored your question completely.

I'm not mad at Clinton. AK Forty Seven aka Tony Stark alluded to the economic crash being a Bush thing. Ignoring conveniently (as you always do) the role the other side of the aisle had in it.

 

[Cuddles]

Politically defend, tooth and nail what? Where?

Are you referring to the bovine excrement about Trump colluding with Russia to hack the election? Because I would show equal distrust to a claim that Trump is actually a Martian. You know, without proof.

Regarding the Stormy Daniels issue, as I have said, without proof I can't condemn the man but I personally believe that allegation to be true based on what I read. I'll also pause here to state that I have the right to believe whatever the fuck I want, whether or not a late 50-something internet lurking fag hag from Canada agrees.

You get all pissy because I don't see every point with the same hate filled glasses you wear. I attack the events and issues I believe to be wrong. You attack the people you want to be wrong (as long as they are on the other side, of course).

Why personally believe the stormy Daniels story but not the Russian collusion story which is backed by more circumstantial evidence?