Quote from simsim:
try EMA cross overs like 10/28, 13/50, experiment and find the crossovers that suits your temperament
Post-optimization is an attempt to solve a dynamic problem with a static solution. That's called "inherently sub-optimal".Quote from mogul:
problem with that is that certain variables work during certain timeperiods
I had some fun testing 30 futures markets using a dual sma\ema cross system, works great when you optimize, but not so well in out-of-sample testing

Quote from Dave2:
Hi Sweetlettuce,
First thanks for your input.
I think the question is simple enough as it stands, Choak has provided me with an excellent site with hundreds of strategies to trade. On browsing, I have seen several that interest me. AS you can see, John also has provide a simple strategy (in my opinion) which I will be looking at. These guys seem to understand the question ok.
Have you come across the phrase 'Keep Things Simple'. I am not being sarcastic here. As you may well be aware there are strategies/systems that incorporate several types of indicators as well as MA combos in order to confirm whether a trade should be entered or exited. I have used them mystelf, hence my question.
Can you explain your statement:
'there is a huge difference between a simple stragegy and a profitable strategy'
What is the difference? Are you implying that simple strategies are not as profitable as sophisticated strategies? Your evidence, as Flat 5 mentions, will be educational.
I suppose in the end, what might be a sophisticated strategy for one trader, might well be a simple one for another.
Horses for Courses.
No offence meant by any of my comments![]()