People by doing trading are also making good money. All you need to do is work with patience and keep back testing your strategies.
Some trading methods are un-backtestable, that is, impossible to implement.People by doing trading are also making good money. All you need to do is work with patience and keep back testing your strategies.
Can you name any examples?4. thats not true - smaller investor has an edge over larger players, as there are plenty of capacity constrained strategies that you can find and run
You just need to trade statistically significant number of trades to get yourself a higher success #, like VC.You cant predict when the big winning periods will come. Otherwise hedge funds wouldnt trade through those periods of losing months. They would just stop and wait. Same applies to smaller traders. Unless you have a highly monthly win rate you never know when those winning periods will come, you could be waiting a long time. Lumpy trading profits are not predictable like other seasonal businesses, like retail shops, where large profits are almost guaranteed to come every Xmas.
If I am hunting black swans and my method has positive expectancy, I just have to trade more to have a higher chance of catching the swan. Same logic in venture capital investing. One Google pays for 10-100 failures.Of course you don't know when your strategy is going to make or lose money. You're almost asking the right question. It's not about the win rate but rather about the positive expectation of the strategy. If your strategy goes into a lengthy drawdown or even into a flat period, you need to know that it still has positive expectation to be able to rely on it.
Given a certainty that your strategy still works, you can make allowances for drawdowns or flat periods (e.g. a Sharpe 2 strategy can have a 6 month drawdown or a flat period, but far less likely to have a losing year). For example, imagine that you found a recurrent arbitrage that, on average, takes 1-2 months to collapse but in the worse case scenario will have to held to expiration of the securities.
You can net 1 point ES every day. I can't do that. So, you win.Make the following simulation in Excel:
- Account: $50,000.
- Margin ES per contract: $5,000.
- Net profit per trading day: 1 points ES (per contract).
- Still deduct the commission from the 1 point profit.
- Trading period: 12 months.
- Take end of each month $5,000 from your account for living expenses.
- Reinvest the remaining money.
Questions:
Let us know your answer and I will show you mine.
- Is this possible?
- Will you are account still grow?
- How much money will there be in your account after 12 months?
A super-obvious example is mis-priced corporate actions like subscription rights or stubs. Usually, these are not big enough to get involved for bigger players and yet you can make pretty reasonable returns.Can you name any examples?
Can you name any examples?
I am not challenging your point, just want some help finding them.
Thanks.

Looks like fun.What usually happens here at ET when examples are given...
![]()
You willing to take that chance ?
wrbtrader