Altucher calls Warren Buffett a F-----g liar

[dartmus]

He has completely deceived the public. Very smart on his part but its about time he gets called out.

He's never asked me to check the definition of 'solicit'

Thank you for directing me to that definition. After reconsidering if it materially changes the circumstances I've formed the conclusion it doesn't change my view of the circumstances. If there's a technical loophole that enables materially misrepresenting the circumstances then please help me get past the moral dilemma I'm experiencing.

First check the definition of first real girlfriend from highschool and then read the quote below

 

[marketsurfer]

sadness accentuated with an exclamation point?

Yes, i feel bad they were sold out by their own father in the name of public relations.

 

[dartmus]

Yes, i feel bad they were sold out by their own father in the name of public relations.

It's my observation and opinion you're one of those rare people unable to comprehend or feel sadness.

 

[Cswim63]

Bravo to Altucher for calling out this phony. He has completely deceived the public. Very smart on his part but its about time he gets called out.

I feel very bad for his children. Rather than buffett trusting them to continue earning and giving yet have fantastically wonderful lives he decides not to even trust his own kids.

sad!

He might trust his children but not his children's children's children. History is full of examples of money tearing apart families. As far as lots of money being fantastically wonderful show an example if you would. It seems to make one a big target.
Case in point--Swimr

 

[Cswim63]

He might trust his children but not his children's children's children. History is full of examples of money tearing apart families. As far as lots of money being fantastically wonderful show an example if you would. It seems to make one a big target.
Case in point--Swimr

Let's get off this Pig of a thread. There's so much low hanging fruit out there for villians.

 

[d08]

I feel very bad for his children. Rather than buffett trusting them to continue earning and giving yet have fantastically wonderful lives he decides not to even trust his own kids.

I would do exactly the same thing.
Since when do you need billions to have a wonderful life. In all likelihood they'd end up fighting over it. Also, most smart and rich people seem to go this route.
I've been in a decades long fight over an inheritance, what initially seemed like an asset has turned into a liability, I definitely wouldn't want my kids to experience that.

 

[marketsurfer]

I would do exactly the same thing.
Since when do you need billions to have a wonderful life. In all likelihood they'd end up fighting over it. Also, most smart and rich people seem to go this route.
I've been in a decades long fight over an inheritance, what initially seemed like an asset has turned into a liability, I definitely wouldn't want my kids to experience that.

Yeah, i understand. I am witnessing similar


But NOT sharing fairly with kids will definitely launch total war after WB passes away.

 

[Butterball]

You mean like the myth he only owns a tiny house in Omaha and earns $100k per year??

I know no one who believes those fairytales. You?

 

[oldnemesis]

A resource on all things Buffett... contains much more than I really wanted to know :



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Buffett

 

[d08]

Yeah, i understand. I am witnessing similar

But NOT sharing fairly with kids will definitely launch total war after WB passes away.

Buffett said: "My family won't receive huge amounts of my net worth. That doesn't mean they'll get nothing. My children have already received some money from me and Susie and will receive more. I still believe in the philosophy ... that a very rich person should leave his kids enough to do anything but not enough to do nothing."

How is that not sharing fairly? When I read about the huge property fights, it's more often about huge inheritances. Receiving billions doesn't make anyone less greedy, it makes them greedier.