Quote from CPTrader:
So what's the snake oil part??
Numerous public statements from Simons that are either
demonstrably false, misleading, incomplete, contradictory,
or just don't make any sense.
Numbers surrounding the Renaissance fund that don't
add up.
A monthly return series that shows stong evidence of
either return smoothing or unexploited structure. I vote
for the smoothing, especially since a near-optimal universal
portfolio of "small and ephemeral edges" (Simon's words)
should show more month-to-month variability.
There is something wrong with the Renaissance story.
It rings only slightly more true than Eddie Lampert's
kidnap story.
Quote from CPTrader:
I am curious about the Axcom connection...any
more insights on this?
Axcom was renamed Medallion. They are the same fund.
The graph shown on this page:
http://math.berkeley.edu/~berlek/fin.html
used to be titled "Renaissance Medallion Fund." Berlekamp
took off the title earlier this year after I posted about
the connection on another forum. He did mention the
connection in a widely read review of "Fotune's Formula"
for American Scientist. Here is the link:
http://www.americanscientist.org/te...etail/assetid/47321;jsessionid=baa9OLgyl1RbGr
read the last sentence of the review.
Berlekamp has a background in Information Theory. His
graduate advisor was Claude Shannon. He also worked
closely with John Kelly, of Kelly Criteria fame. What he
brought to Renaisance was the risk/position/allocation
management, the volatility pumping third of the equation.
Simons already had the statistical mining for small edges
part, and he developed the perception management part
over the years -- now he has that part down to a science!
.