Alternatives to Prop Firms?

It is not surprising that no one has responded to the above post. ET posters cannot recognize an insightful post. Make a copy and paste it to the side of your monitors. It will serve you well.

thanks elduerino.
 
Quote from LeeD:

Maybe that's their PhDs, not MBAs. Both schools have top PhD programs for those folks who are more into quant and high-frequency stuff.

Check out there Masters in Financial Engineering. This was the degree to which I was primarily referring. Been so long since I looked into attending one of the programs that I forget they aren't part of the MBA track.

As others have stated, in this and other threads on ET, equity trading on the street is largely becoming (may have completely become) a quantitative affair.
 
Quote from Maverick74:

Do you have any idea how many guys here are looking for trading jobs, and many of them have stellar track records.

Out of interest, why don't people with great track records just trade their own funds? Anyone with a decent track record should have at least $1 mill stashed away, and 20%+ per annum on that is enough to do it yourself. Set up an incubator fund, trade it for 1-3 years, and you will start attracting capital.

Great posts on this thread by the way, shame the OP didn't listen.
 
Quote from Ghost of Cutten:

Out of interest, why don't people with great track records just trade their own funds? Anyone with a decent track record should have at least $1 mill stashed away, and 20%+ per annum on that is enough to do it yourself. Set up an incubator fund, trade it for 1-3 years, and you will start attracting capital.

Great posts on this thread by the way, shame the OP didn't listen.

I'll give you some of the most common things I hear. In some cases guys are using an automated trading system that requires a certain amount of capital to contain volatility. So it could be a guy that is trading a system with 50k in capital that ideally needs 250k to 500k to run effectively.

In other cases, guys want to make more money with less risk. Say you have 100k and you are making 50% a year but you are also risking 30% drawdowns. So they would rather earn 20% a year on 10 million with 7% drawdowns. They make more money taking less risk. Nobody wants to push their account all in to earn sufficient returns.

In other cases, the guys who are trying to raise the "big" money, they can't do it with a track of under 10 million. Many fund of funds here in Chicago are prohibited from even looking at a guy unless he already has 50 to 100 million AUM.
 
Quote from TsTrades:

I get "defensive" (or, more accurately, ticked off) when people either make statements that I know not to be true, or when people don't answer the question I asked!

Again, I'm not really interested in prop firms anymore. I think (and experts like Brett Steenbarger think) that anywhere that asks you to put down your own money is basically a scam, and that you're a customer, not an employee. That is, these are "arcades," not true prop firms. And I don't mind saying, and I don't care what you think of this, that I'm better than that. If there were more high-quality firms out there, maybe I'd get into one. But there are very few, so that's why I'm looking for an ALTERNATIVE to a prop firm (hence the title of this thread, for those with poor reading comprehension skills).

If anyone understands this and wants to provide a suggestion or two, please do so. Otherwise, quite frankly, shut the hell up.

Haven't read it all yet, but this thread is hilarious. Just a comment about prop firms my man. It sounds like the "prop" firm you were a part of was actually what is now called "retail in disguise". A true prop firm would not require that you put up a deposit. A true prop firm would capitalize you and hopefully they would set you up with some sort of mentor in addition to some form of training as well. True prop firms have at least some/a little vested interest in your success.

On another note, it seems like you've passed over the advice that Maverick offered....if there is anyone on this site that knows anything about the world of trading, it's that guy. Maverick I'd like to thank you by the way for the thread on tape reading when you went back and forth with shortseller. Classic. I remember my mentor having me read that before I started trading and it made very little sense to me. After I traded for a few months it made more sense, now here we are almost 4 years later and it's second nature to me in watching price action. Although I rarely ever saw double prints.
 
Quote from TsTrades:

Ahhhhhh! I said I was done. And I really am. But I just can't help but point out that there is something seriously wrong with you people. I mean, do you really think what you guys do is normal? Normal people would say (or even just think to themselves) "well, I don't think you're going to get in, but here's the information you're looking for. Good luck," and leave it at that. Instead, you just demonstrate in extremely clear fashion the chip on YOUR respective shoulders. Maybe you're just trying to fend off potential competition? I don't know.

I'd truly love to complain, but realistically whom would I complain to? The FCC? As disgusting (and weird) as what you guys do is, is IS free speech, and is therefore protected. As they say, the best revenge is living well, and I'm confident that after going to a REAL source for career information, that's exactly what will happen. And there's nothing you'll be able to do about it.

This thread is getting even more hilarious. Damn't I need to go to bed, but I think I'll finish it. Lol!!!
 
i never post on this board, i use it to research trading. for the record, i've been in sales 5-6 years, went on to retail brokerage, and am currently a financial advisor for one of the biggest insurance/annuity/money mgmt companies in the country.

What i am thoroughly experienced in is turnover and bad attitudes. people who come in with shitty attitudes and a sense of entitlement either don't make it or get asked to leave during the first interview. i've seen it more than once.

Some kid, former floor trader, comes 5 minutes late to my brokerage firm and gets sent home. he's incensed, all "i don't need this, i worked on the floor, blah blah blah..." i didn't argue, but dude, you show up 5 minutes late with an iced coffee and a bagel in your hand, what do you want? If you were that special, maybe you wouldn't need a new job.

That's also an environment where they care less about age, small retail firms. it's not prop and it's not trading school, but top producer my first year did $2.2M (it was his 7th year, he was hired at 47, broke).

I work with a guy with a great resume, goldman and lehman. but he was in operations, and he's lazy, and he sucks at his job. his fancy attitude is actually a detractor from his success. imagine that...:)
 
Quote from Maverick74:

I'll try to offer you some help. I've worked in both NY and Chicago. I know a lot of guys in the prop world in both cities. I hate to say this, but you are shit out of luck. Guys in their 30's are pretty much damaged goods without a track record.

Yes I know what the firm's websites say. They could get sued for age discrimination if they say anything else. The fact of the matter is, most prop firms want 22 year old guys to train with no bad habits any little to no knowledge of the industry. Once you have traded prop and failed, you are done for the most part unless you choose to keep funding your account. NY is the most hyper competitive place in the universe. Hell there are ex-goldman guys looking for paid trading gigs. You really think you have an edge on those guys?

Based on the history you have provided us, your only shot is to self finance and put together 12 good months. Now if you pull that off, it's a different ball game.

As for why firms are not looking for portfolio managers, look, it's about capital. When you hold over night positions you tie up capital and you are not generating cash flow to the firm. If the firm wanted portfolio managers they would just give their money to SAC. They don't need some 30 year old kid running a "book". Where is the edge in that. These firms are about making money each and every day, not sitting on long term risk.

On a side note, there are far more quality prop firms in Chicago then NY. NY is a sales town, not trading. But even in Chicago, getting a trading job in your 30's, I just don't see the risk to reward in that for the firm. Do you have any idea how many guys here are looking for trading jobs, and many of them have stellar track records.


Like you I have traded for Prop firms in NY, Chicago, and Florida. I don't think age is a huge factor. I know plenty of guys in their late 30's/40's who get gigs at other prop firms. It comes down to part track record and part risk management. Most real firms these days want to know exactly how you handle risk. That seems to be the most important factor. Even if you have huge numbers, but have giant swings........firms these days won't go near you. Firms seem to want more consistent/base hitters these days. You go into a firm like First NY these days and get clobbered in the first month they will most likely can you.
 
Quote from EPrado:

I don't think age is a huge factor. I know plenty of guys in their late 30's/40's who get gigs at other prop firms. It comes down to part track record and part risk management.

I know guys in their 30's and 40's as well who got gigs at prop firms. They all had track records.
 
when you trade other people's money you have rules!!! and have more access to capital. use that cash for a downpayment on a house.

trading with house's money not yours.

a genuine prop firm doesn't require capital deposit either or any fees etc. they pay you to come to work and trade.







Quote from Gubinec:

If you can't trade your own money, what makes you think you can trade others'?

Save yourself time and money and open your own account. You can swing trade, or trade on any time frame for that matter, on your own account, too.

Read a good book or two, spend time on simulator for a week or two, and then get into the action using tight stops.

I recommend non-time based charts.
 
Back
Top