Alternative splicing: why opening is more important than close
- Thread starter harrytrader
- Start date
And you wally=pspr MYSTIC MOONBELIEVER LAND TO REAL EARTH 
Hahahaha your PLANETS influence on stock market that you consider as INDISPUTABLE "science" really FUNNY ! And does your INDISPUTABLE "science" explains why I can calculate 10643.3 as Local Top in theory and in real today the Dow made 10643.55 (notwithstanding the bottom on the green label at 10494 theo real 10490) and that WITHOUT PLANET INFLUENCE and WITHOUT FIBONACCI and WITHOUT PI but by applying RATIONAL DIFFERENTIAL ECONOMICAL EQUATIONS ? If I don't need the planets then the correlation is not due to them if ever there are since I am kind enough to only consider the hypothesis of my opponents as fairly as possible. I am aware that you are exploiting the confusion with true science of Cosmology and Astrophysics and transpose them into stock market whereas this is DOUBTFUL and at least NOT "INDISPUTABLE" as you pretend.
<IMG SRC=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=414012>
? If I don't need the planets then the correlation is not due to them if ever there are since I am kind enough to only consider the hypothesis of my opponents as fairly as possible. I am aware that you are exploiting the confusion with true science of Cosmology and Astrophysics and transpose them into stock market whereas this is DOUBTFUL and at least NOT "INDISPUTABLE" as you pretend.<IMG SRC=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=414012>
As you can see the market made a turn exactly within one points from the theorical values of 10519 (Real Low of 20/01/04 = 10519.56) and 10560 (Real High of 22/01/04 = 10660.88) that were calculated far in advance :
<IMG SRC=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=416083>
<IMG SRC=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=416083>
The reversal of the market at these extremes is linked with what is called SOC in non-linear dynamics systems
see
Introduction to SOC (Self-Organised Criticality)
See
http://www.santafe.edu/~hag/internet/node9.html
Self-Organized Criticality
In physics, a critical point is a point at which a system changes radically its behavior or structure, for instance, from solid to liquid. In standard critical phenomena, there is a control parameter which an experimenter can vary to obtain this radical change in behavior. In the case of melting, the control parameter is temperature. Self-organized critical phenomena, by contrast, is exhibited by driven systems which reach a critical state by their intrinsic dynamics, independently of the value of any control parameter. The archetype of a self-organized critical system is a sand pile. Sand is slowly dropped onto a surface, forming a pile. As the pile grows, avalanches occur which carry sand from the top to the bottom of the pile. At least in model systems, the slope of the pile becomes independent of the rate at which the system is driven by dropping sand. This is the (self-organized) critical slope.
see
Introduction to SOC (Self-Organised Criticality)
See
http://www.santafe.edu/~hag/internet/node9.html
Self-Organized Criticality
In physics, a critical point is a point at which a system changes radically its behavior or structure, for instance, from solid to liquid. In standard critical phenomena, there is a control parameter which an experimenter can vary to obtain this radical change in behavior. In the case of melting, the control parameter is temperature. Self-organized critical phenomena, by contrast, is exhibited by driven systems which reach a critical state by their intrinsic dynamics, independently of the value of any control parameter. The archetype of a self-organized critical system is a sand pile. Sand is slowly dropped onto a surface, forming a pile. As the pile grows, avalanches occur which carry sand from the top to the bottom of the pile. At least in model systems, the slope of the pile becomes independent of the rate at which the system is driven by dropping sand. This is the (self-organized) critical slope.
nononsense wrote:
> Please straighten out your "Pi theorem" figuring prominently in
> your "mysticism" thread from a week ago. Among your
> mountain of published stuff, this is something we all can at
> least verify as being nonsense. You can't afford not to correct
> this. Should we consider everything else you publish also as
> crap & trash.
Following on what I said elsewhere, people actually interested in
mathematically-based Technical Analysis can start with
http://www.iop.org/EJ/journal/Quant
and find references to what math people (you can call them
quants) are doing: e.g. hidden markov models in intraday high
frequency finance, for example, rather than the mishmash of
math and mysticism and strawmen in
http://www.econometric-wave.com/home/home.html.html
> Please straighten out your "Pi theorem" figuring prominently in
> your "mysticism" thread from a week ago. Among your
> mountain of published stuff, this is something we all can at
> least verify as being nonsense. You can't afford not to correct
> this. Should we consider everything else you publish also as
> crap & trash.
Following on what I said elsewhere, people actually interested in
mathematically-based Technical Analysis can start with
http://www.iop.org/EJ/journal/Quant
and find references to what math people (you can call them
quants) are doing: e.g. hidden markov models in intraday high
frequency finance, for example, rather than the mishmash of
math and mysticism and strawmen in
http://www.econometric-wave.com/home/home.html.html
Quote from harrytrader:
Hahahaha it's me who says mystical nonsense when you are supporter of the Moon Believers like Wally
[...]
Harry,
I challanged you to show this. It is flatly wrong, complete nonsense. All you did is to put me in your category of "Moon Believers". Where did I ever indicate that I was a supporter of "Moon Believers"?
I'm convinced now that you are a complete nut. Like others pointed out, you need help man!
Quit signing your crap with:
-- H S M Coxeter - "Introduction to Geometry (1961, Wiley)"
nononsense
You nut yourself : what you quote is not from me it is somebody's else quote, you're definitely a no brainer. It is really funny that you don't say anything about pspr when he says that the planets influence are INDISPUTABLE - hahahaha - and on the contrary you are angry because I am showing why people are mystics by confusing cosmology with stock market. If you don't know the difference between Cosmology which is an official science and astrology I'm sorry for you. Are you as INDISPUTABLE as pspr
If you don't know what is research in Cosmology I will give you a reference:
"The Golden Ratio: The Story of Phi, the World's Most Astonishing Number "
from Mario Livio cosmologist at the Hubble Space Telescope Center
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/t...fordat07/104-2990168-6998330?v=glance&s=books
Why Mario Livio is talking about Golden ratios ? Because Golden Ratio is now very present in Cosmology phenomenas although they don't know why as I quoted Feynman !!! The purpose of Science is to answer the Why question and before answering the question one must first consider the existence of the phenomena. The same thing in Stock Market ! What is the origin of Fibo ratios in Stock Market ? If you don't want just consider the question you're just a specie of Solipcism - nothing exists reality is a pure illusion - which is even worse than Mysticism.
"The Golden Ratio: The Story of Phi, the World's Most Astonishing Number "
from Mario Livio cosmologist at the Hubble Space Telescope Center
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/t...fordat07/104-2990168-6998330?v=glance&s=books
Why Mario Livio is talking about Golden ratios ? Because Golden Ratio is now very present in Cosmology phenomenas although they don't know why as I quoted Feynman !!! The purpose of Science is to answer the Why question and before answering the question one must first consider the existence of the phenomena. The same thing in Stock Market ! What is the origin of Fibo ratios in Stock Market ? If you don't want just consider the question you're just a specie of Solipcism - nothing exists reality is a pure illusion - which is even worse than Mysticism.
Quote from harrytrader:
You nut yourself : what you quote is not from me it is somebody's else quote, you're definitely a no brainer. It is really funny that you don't say anything about pspr when he says that the planets influence are INDISPUTABLE - hahahaha - and on the contrary you are angry because I am showing why people are mystics by confusing cosmology with stock market. If you don't know the difference between Cosmology which is an official science and astrology I'm sorry for you. Are you as INDISPUTABLE as pspr