Almost 2,000 RobinHood Accounts Hacked

Who determines what is a regulated securities exchange in the United States - the Google dictionary or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the US Securities Exchange Commission?

Which carries the weight of law when it comes to enforcement, legal remedies, and tort litigation?

Who holds themselves out to the public as a regulated securities exchange - Robinhood or NASDAQ?

To everyone that thinks I don't know what i'm talking about,

I'm done with this discussion. And before I leave I just want to point out what the english dictionary has to say about this. I'm not making this up, this is what the dictionary has to say. You can say i'm wrong all you want but that would also be going against the true meaning of what an exchange is.

View attachment 241695 View attachment 241695


Let that sink in for a minute...
 
To everyone that thinks I don't know what i'm talking about,

I'm done with this discussion. And before I leave I just want to point out what the english dictionary has to say about this. I'm not making this up, this is what the dictionary has to say. You can say i'm wrong all you want but that would also be going against the true meaning of what an exchange is.

View attachment 241695 View attachment 241695


Let that sink in for a minute...

Some words are 'terms of art.'

In the context of the original discussion, the word 'exchange' has a specific meaning. The dictionary meaning is irrelevant with terms of art.

Many statutes begin by defining the terms used within the text of the statute, regardless of what's in a dictionary.

This discussion, as it relates to the word 'exchange' was speaking to the enforcement of any applicable rules, regulations, and/or laws. In this case, the enforcement bodies with jurisdiction over exchanges will define what qualifies as an exchange. So that definition would be controlling.

upload_2020-10-16_20-18-55.png
 
...


Let that sink in for a minute...

Dude, we're not trying to abrogate what you think the definition of the word "exchange" means. We're trying to tell you that RH is not an exchange, in the sense that you originally posited.

The exchange, for trading purposes, is the place where the stocks, futures or whatever change hands, as it were. RH, Charles Schwab, etc are the brokers who simply route your orders to that exchange so they can change hands. They are the middle-men. They are the catalyst for folks like you and I to be able to interact with the regulated exchange. If we had a seat on the exchange, we would not need the middle-man. We'd be interacting directly with the exchange.

Nouns and verbs, man. Learn the difference.
 
Well to me anywhere you trade anything is an exchange. And if you want to get all technical about it then it is still an exchange because the broker is helping you buy an sell stocks in EXCHANGE for fees. When you look up the word exchange in the dictionary, it means to trade. Just because its not a global exchange doesn't mean it's not any kind of exchange.

Walmart can be considered an exchange, your exchanging money for products. A yard sale can be considered an exchange, just because there are no charts to look at when you buy something doesn't mean it isn't.

You guys really need to get off your high horses and start taking what I'm saying with more consideration.

upload_2020-10-16_21-38-35.png

:D
 
To everyone that thinks I don't know what i'm talking about,

I'm done with this discussion. And before I leave I just want to point out what the english dictionary has to say about this. I'm not making this up, this is what the dictionary has to say. You can say i'm wrong all you want but that would also be going against the true meaning of what an exchange is.

View attachment 241695 View attachment 241695


Let that sink in for a minute...
rather than eating some humble pie and admitting you were wrong, you doubled down on stupid. Congrats, you played yourself
 
This might be a good place to explain the difference between an exchange (NASDAQ), a marketplace (AMZN), and a lost opportunity (the 10 or so years before the previous 10).

I hate AMZN. :-(

 
The attacks unleashed a torrent of complaints on social media, where investors recounted futile attempts to call the brokerage, which doesn’t have a customer service phone number.

Yeah the attempts will be futile don't you think considering that they don't have a phone number?? LOL

I bet you this is an inside job. All these hacking will be able to hit such a massive number of customers so precisely successful even with 2-factor authentication has to be carried out by somebody who is familiar with the inside working of Robinhood knowing all the weakest links in its security system (if any) and its policies. This is ridiculous. Well, you get what you pay for.
 
Interesting. I thought they don't accept clients outside the US.

My thoughts exactly. Maybe he's from Montreal in the USA. There are cities named Montreal in USA, you know that? I've seen them on Google maps.
 
My experience in the last six months or so trying to call Schwab has been very poor. Long hold times, and on one call I was unable to choose an option to speak with a live rep until going through an extremely long message about activating "Voice ID," and there did not seem to a way to opt out of it.

Yes, they have a phone number, but I have zero confidence in my ability to reach a live rep when it really matters.

And it isn't just Schwab. I am certainly not the first person to make this observation, but every financial institution--whether it's a bank, broker, insurance company or something else--seems to have decided that COVID-19 has given them an excuse for really, really bad customer service and long hold times. Of course, it doesn't make sense. If everyone can, or in some cases must work from home, they should have more reps available--not less. A reduction in available staff may have made sense at the very beginning of the lockdown back in March, when many companies were not equipped to allow their customer service reps to work from home. But now it's just a bogus excuse to cut back on service, and force people to conduct business through e-mail or secure messaging instead of by telephone.

And this is a trend that began long before the pandemic.

Almost two years ago I got into a dispute with Spotify about a gift card that could not be activated. They have never had telephone customer service. When I e-mailed them, I got a canned autoreply suggesting that I communicate with their support team on Twitter.

And of course, the Twitter account, like most support services through e-mail, is staffed by dozens of people. While working a single issue, you have to exchange messages with multiple team members, and they don't always read the entire thread. So to put it bluntly, sometimes they really don't know what the f**k they're talking about. It's really disgusting.

My dispute with Spotify escalated to the point where I filed an arbitration case. And even their staff attorney would not give me a real office telephone number where I could reach him. Keep in mind that this was in early 2019, long before COVID-19. The only phone number I ever got was a cell phone that forwarded into Google Voice if he did not answer.

Spotify has even stated "We do not have a telephone number" in some of their SEC filings. No joke.

It's utterly ridiculous.

The one advantage to e-mail and messaging is that you get a great "paper" trail of the complete incompetence of some of these support reps.

I can't disclose the details, but my case against Spotify was settled, before reaching a full arbitration hearing, in a way that was very favorable for me. And pursuant to their terms of service, they had to pay all the arbitration filing fees, too.

All over a $30 gift card that their support team could not get activated. I drilled them a second as*hole, and thoroughly enjoyed the process.

BMK

And it's not just banks and financial companies. I agree it's all companies. Ebay, Paypal and Amazon have all shut down their phone lines all with the excuse of Covid 19. It's ridiculous.
 
Back
Top