Quote from JohnGreen:
Mark-- I'm pretty disappointed in your reply, frankly. This is NOT a case of calling a put a call or a radical error in judgment and does not deserve the kind of reaction you responded with. I'm definitely NOT a rookie trader, and you should know that already since I have participated in numerous discussions with you here on elitetrader, and have generally agreed with most of your positions as being wise and sensible.
Yes John. I know you are not a beginner.
I stand by my comments based on my experience. Admittedly, I don't trade the RUT, but based on my experiences with SPX and NDX, most of the time the differences between the settlement price (which IS calculated from the opening prints for each stock-perhaps my terminology was a bit off, but my understanding is NOT) and the quotes you see on your broker's screen at the market's open ARE relatively small. With the RUT, the differences may be somewhat larger occasionally due to the fact that many small company shares trade with less frequency and volume.
I must tell you that if you stand on this belief then you and I are going to have to agree to disagree. True, when the opening is dull and is relatively unchanged, there is a good chance that the settlement price of any of the cash-settled indexes (SPX, RUT, NDX) <i>will</i> be near the market's opening price.
But when there is any decent sized move, settlement prices cause a lot of joy and pain due to how far they are from the opening print for the index. Many times (I lack the data to tell you how often this happens) the settlement price is significantly above the official high, or below the official low, for the day.
That leaves beginners bewildered, angry, and they feel cheated. That's their own fault for not understanding how the settlement is calculated. But the bottom line remains that this happens often enough to be a major concern and I don't believe it's right to suggest that one can expect the settlement and initial prints to be similar.
The reason why this disparity occurs can be discussed, but it's really not germane.
Second, IF you read my comments carefully, you will note that there was a warning based on my own experience. I know EXACTLY what can happen!! I also gave some very specific advice in there to close the position without access to protection from the futures. Read my comments again, and you will see that this is so.
Yes you properly (ok, that's an opinion, but we share the same opinion) suggested closing. But running to futures does not afford good protection <i>for the risk involved</i>. Sometimes the market reverses. If the trader buys calls for protection, the loss resulting from the reversal is not large. But it is possible that futures will decline by enough to offset all profits from the original trade. Based on my personal experience I feel it is a bad idea to adjust an option position (with negative gamma) with a high priced underlying asset.
Third, you CAN more or less protect yourself with futures contract overnight, although it will probably require a long night looking at the screen, and perhaps some trading losses and commissions costs if whipsaws occured.
I do understand how to do this effectively, but generally it would not be worth it to lose a night's sleep unless the dollar amounts were quite large.
I'm sure you do. but you were suggesting that a newcomer do this. Who would be available to show him how to do it effectively?
In the scenario that would generate large losses to the OP, however, the protection would be very effective.
Losses are limited because it was a spread. And I'm NOT saying you cannot use futures (although to me it's a NEVER), but why use them when the options are trading and calls are available? That's my point. Cheap calls are more efficient for protection than expensive futures contracts (or shares of stock). If it's after hours, that is an entirely separate discussion.
If the RUT futures were to rise past 530 overnight ( on a fair value basis) in a relatively steady fashion, the protection afforded by the futures would be close to complete. In rare cases, it could actually be profitable on a net basis. Admittedly, this isn't the perfect solution, but it would be MUCH superior to watching helplessly!! Don't you agree?
Yes. I agree. But I would prefer to buy calls instead. That affords the same protection with an overnight rally. And if the futures move high enough to generate a profit - possible when you own extra naked longs vs. a spsread - then the call buyer could short futures to lock in the profits. That's using futures when it's impossible to suffer a whipsaw.
Finally, I admit that I rarely hold positions into the settlement process, and would NOT hold this RUT position overnight with it being so close (as I advised).
Agree 100%. It's folly. It's risky. Regardless of where the market opens tomorrow and regardless of how successful this spread turns out to be, in our opinion, holding overnight tonight was the wroing thing to do. Holding into settlement is a pure gamble, and that's not investing.
Usually, I close my positions before expiry week for 0.15 or so if they are credit spreads, or roll them out. Debit spreads that are OTM can be held into expiry if they are protecting credit spreads for the next month without major concern since they can help you if the market gaps into the position overnight.
Me too. Hate settlement risk.
I trust this clarifies my position and we can put this to rest.
It does and I hope I have clarified mine. Putting it to rest works for me.