Its now 225 yrs old document. Granted its authors were super prescient, and pretty much still works literally. butwill It be valid in literal interpretation a 1000yrs from here? 10,000?What is this love affair with constraints and an old out of date and inadequate to begin with piece of paper? I don't get it.
Perhaps those who most love it are into constraints and are inadequate themselves (themself?).
ops:
