All Sonic staff quits after wages slashed in half.

[sle]

US should immobilize its citizens to assist in ICE's efforts in enforcing its immigration policy, perhaps by offering rewards to citizens for tips IF the government really wants to do something about ensuring all entrants to USA are legally permitted to enter.

What else is it going to be, an "ejaculation seat" and "every color of the rectum"?
Make American Great Again!

PS. I get it that proles need to hate someone and that xenophobia is the easiest outlet. What I don't get is why the Republican party (the party of free markets, of self reliance) decided to pander to that crowd.

 

[JSOP]

What else is it going to be, an "ejaculation seat" and "every color of the rectum"?
Make American Great Again!

PS. I get it that proles need to hate someone and that xenophobia is the easiest outlet. What I don't get is why the Republican party (the party of free markets, of self reliance) decided to pander to that crowd.

What??!!! Now you are confusing me...

 

[Sig]

All of the Liberals seem to forget that 90% of the people who show up at the border trying to enter illegally are NOT asylum seekers but are there for economic reasons. And for asylum seekers, besides "credible fear", there is a criteria of other alternative countries that could also be safe haven. As much as US hates Canada for supplying US its own "illegals", Canada is considered an alternative country that's also a safe haven and US does dump majority of migrants asylum seekers onto Canada like what Trump did at the beginning of his term when he signed the Executive Order to ban the entry of people from 50 countries And there is also other European countries that are also considered safe haven so "credible fear" along is not enough for an asylum seeker to be automatically granted asylum in America and US can and is well within its reason to deny asylum seekers entry, other factors aside.



This is why I said:

Your a smart guy I know, so at this point I think you get it but don't want to get it. For sure the vast majority of people who claim asylum are not eligible for it, and once we've evaluated that they are not should be deported. That is completely irrelevant to the fact that we have to screen everyone who requests it. We can't refuse them entry, can't dump them in Canada, can't sign an executive order banning them, can't tell them to go somewhere else, can't do anything until we've evaluated their asylum request! So, again for the n'th time, how does "build a wall" do anything to address the situation of those who walk up to said wall (or more likely a legal entry point) and claim asylum?

 

[sle]

What??!!! Now you are confusing me...

I am merely saying that your illiteracy goes well with your xenophobia.

 

[murray t turtle]

Not having enough money does not make one a refugee, first of all. I don't have enough money for me to buy that mega mansion, does that make a refugee? Second you can voluntarily present yourself as a whatever all you want at another country's border but entering that country by crossing that border without receiving that country's permission first is wrong. Just like you have walls that are three stories high for your house to keep the unwanted intruders out, a country should too. Walls = stopping unwanted, unlawful entrants out. That's the logic.

%%
If that town is a small town; better for students to work + get some tips than NOT work @ all.
I worked that way as a grocery sacker/student, good tips .I would have eaten @ Taco Bell more, i like thier 4 +walls; but back in that day-mom made better cheaper tacos. LOL

In a perfect world commissions would have been cheaper many years ago LOL ;
but good things come to those who work. If that fast food management was like Morris Dees/SPLC, i would most likely quit/consult lawyer...........................................................

 

[JSOP]

That is completely irrelevant to the fact that we have to screen everyone who requests it. We can't refuse them entry, can't dump them in Canada, can't sign an executive order banning them, can't tell them to go somewhere else, can't do anything until we've evaluated their asylum request! So, again for the n'th time, how does "build a wall" do anything to address the situation of those who walk up to said wall (or more likely a legal entry point) and claim asylum?

WHY not??!! WHY does USA has to let everybody who shows up at its door in? Do you let everybody who knocks on your door in? If you don't, then why should a sovereign country? Does your house have walls and a door? If yes, then why can't a sovereign country like United States have wall(s) and a gate? For refugees, asylum seekers or whatever! Even if you choose to let people being hunted by the Mafia or the homeless or anybody who knocks on your door into your house doesn't mean that you are not going to have doors or walls to your house. Last time I checked, USA stands for United States of America not Come One Come All! This is what people seem to forget.

 

[JSOP]

I am merely saying that your illiteracy goes well with your xenophobia.

You disappoint me @sle. I thought you are more sophisticated than that to make statements such as these.

 

[Sig]

WHY not??!! WHY does USA has to let everybody who shows up at its door in? Do you let everybody who knocks on your door in? If you don't, then why should a sovereign country? Does your house have walls and a door? If yes, then why can't a sovereign country like United States have wall(s) and a gate? For refugees, asylum seekers or whatever! Even if you choose to let people being hunted by the Mafia or the homeless or anybody who knocks on your door into your house doesn't mean that you are not going to have doors or walls to your house. Last time I checked, USA stands for United States of America not Come One Come All! This is what people seem to forget.

Because we signed on to a bunch of international treaties, principly the 1951 Refugee Convention, and USA should stand for keeping your word when you sign a treaty, at least until you pull out of said treaty or renegotiate it, don't you think?

But let's redirect you from the squirrel you obviously clearly keep getting distracted by. Clearly a damn inconvenient question for you because you just....can't......seem.....to.....answer......it, but what the flying fuck does a wall do to stop this group of people who can currently request asylum from outside the U.S. on the Mexican side of the border? What is this, 7 posts you've desperately avoided answering that question now? You realize that's far more of an answer than if you'd actually said anything, right?

 

[JSOP]

Because we signed on to a bunch of international treaties, principly the 1951 Refugee Convention, and USA should stand for keeping your word when you sign a treaty, at least until you pull out of said treaty or renegotiate it, don't you think?

And US still does. Do a google search to see how many refugees that USA has accepted throughout history, more than any other country in the world. But that Convention did not state that USA must accept an unlimited amount of refugees either.

but what the flying fuck does a wall do to stop this group of people who can currently request asylum from outside the U.S. on the Mexican side of the border? What is this, 7 posts you've desperately avoided answering that question now? You realize that's far more of an answer than if you'd actually said anything, right?

Because a wall stops people who are not authorized to enter from entering regardless how or where or whether they applied for asylum. That is an answer that I have answered for 7 posts now that you trolls obviously choose to disregard. USA needs a wall. USA wants a wall. USA is getting a wall. You don't like it, go somewhere else. Go to Mexico perhaps. LOL

 

[Sig]

And US still does. Do a google search to see how many refugees that USA has accepted throughout history, more than any other country in the world. But that Convention did not state that USA must accept an unlimited amount of refugees either.



Because a wall stops people who are not authorized to enter from entering regardless how or where or whether they applied for asylum. That is an answer that I have answered for 7 posts now that you trolls obviously choose to disregard. USA needs a wall. USA wants a wall. USA is getting a wall. You don't like it, go somewhere else. Go to Mexico perhaps. LOL

Actually I don't need to do a google search, I have first hand experience with this from a previous professional life when I actually did migrant interdiction ops. There actually is no limit on the number of asylum seekers who will be accepted under the Refugee Act of 1980 (U.S. law). There is a limit of refugees who will be accepted, but who am I kidding, they're all the same as far as you know, right?

But let's get back to facts. A wall doesn't stop anyone under current U.S. law and treaties the U.S. has signed from requesting asylum! Full stop. Which they can do at any point on the border with the U.S. without first crossing into the U.S., and the U.S. has to either admit them or detain them until they've done a credible fear/reasonable feer screening. Which it would cost a few million dollars for us to staff up fully to allow us to do expedited return of spurious asylum seekers, just under a trillion less than building a pointless wall, but you're the fiscally conservative one are you? You seem to refuse to accept this fact, the question you have to ask yourself is why? Again, you're a smart guy, so at this point you're obviously working super hard internally to be obtuse on this point, it must hurt for someone who actually is smart enough to get it to have to pretend so hard that they don't?

And please, if you want to get into a patriotism pissing contest with me, how about I go live in Mexico a year for every time you put your life on the line for your country and you go live there a year for every time I did? It's supremely insulting to tell someone who served their country for over 20 years they should leave that country because they hold a different political view than you, sorry to lose my temper a bit but I have to ask who the fuck do you think you are?