Gold has always been considered, almost by convention a store of value and to an extent I accept that it is. The value is the issue.
How is that value calculated?
Lets examine some of the ways that have been claimed, but that are in point of fact false.
Inflation, Interest Rates.
Lets then look at 1980 - 1990
Bond rates;
1980 - 12.29%
1981 - 14.76%
1982 - 11.89%
1983 - 8.89%
1984 - 10.16%
1985 - 8.01%
1986 - 6.39%
1987 - 6.85%
1988 - 7.68%
1989 - 8.80%
1990 - 8.40%
Inflation measured by CPI = +5.05%
Gold = (-4.86%)
From the previous data, and many more examples, it is clear that Gold has only a coincidental link to Inflation and or Interest rates and it is much more correlated to its value as a commodity that encapsulates the utility value
Utility value.
A slippery concept.
We have the demand for production.......jewellrey [considered a store of value]
The demand for investment [considered a store of value]
So in actuality we run into the same problem.
Gold is not unique in this paradox, other esoteric investments have the same dynamic; Art, Cars, Guitars, Baseball Cards etc.
Gold is so embedded within the human psyche, that it could almost be considered genetic.
Historically it has always been sought after, hoarded, fought over etc. Central Banks, even today hold gold reserves.
This is the basis of the problem.
Even though it has no intrinsic value it nevertheless possesses value because everyone believes it has value.
Therefore to value gold, we have to value the marginal price that the average consumer will lose either the belief, or the ability to buy gold for whatever reason.
Common sense tells us that trying to measure the *belief* would be a highly subjective and inaccurate waste of time, therefore by default, we have purchasing power of the average consumer. This we can easily measure.
India, the worlds largest retail gold market
GDP - per capita (PPP):
$3,300 (2005 est.)
China, often pointed at by Gold Bulls as having a huge demand
GDP - per capita (PPP):
$6,800 (2005 est.)
Britain as a comparison
GDP - per capita (PPP):
$30,300 (2005 est.)
USA again as a comparison
GDP - per capita (PPP):
$41,800 (2005 est.)
We can see that at the higher prices the Asian demand must become muted, simply through the inability to afford the high prices.
jog on
d998