According to Investopedia, if I wanted to purchase a call option at a premium of $3.15, I would have to pay $315 plus commissions (because a stock option contract is the option to buy 100 shares). As best as I can tell, premium is telling me how much above the strike price the value of the stock would have to rise before I would even break even. So, to make any money, the stock would have to rise in value to match the strike price, and then rise even more in order to clear the premium that’s added on top.
At least for the time being, I’ve decided the way I want to go about educating myself with respect to options trading is to go through the examples provided in Thomsett's
Getting Started in Options book one-by-one, so I'll return to the one I copied in a previous post a little later.
But even still, I'll have to do a bit of detective work for myself. For instance, in one of the initial examples, "EQUITY FOR CASH," Thomsett writes...
“You purchase 100 shares at $27 per share, and place $2700 plus trading fees into your account. You receive notice that the purchase has been completed. This is equity investment, and you are a stockholder in the Corporation.”
Perhaps I am reading what Thomsett wrote incorrectly, but if not,
this is crazy!!!
You are not going to purchase 100 shares, and then
afterward, place the money in your account. You're going to have to place the money in your account
first, and
then you will have it available to purchase the shares.
I don't understand why the example was written the way it was. That doesn't make any sense to me logically. The sequence is illogical. If this is indicative of the way the rest of the examples are written, I'm probably going to end up rewriting all of them in a manner I feel is more rational.
That said, I'm going to start with this one...
PROFITABLE DECISIONS:
You decided two months ago to buy a call. You pay the option price of $200, which entitle you to buy 100 shares of a particular stock at $55 per share. The striking price is 55. The option will expire later this month. The stock currently is selling for $60 per share, and the option’s current value is 6 ($600). You have a choice to make: you may exercise the call and buy 100 shares at the contractual price of $55 per share, which is $5 per share below current market value; or you may sell the call and realize a profit of $400 on the investment, consisting of current market value in the option of $600, less the original price of $200. (This example does not include an adjustment for trading costs, so in applying this and other examples, remember that it will cost you of being each time you enter an option transaction and each time you leave one. This should be factored into any calculation of profit or loss on an option trade.)
If the current value is 6, I suppose the original value was 2, though I am not sure since the author appears to change the phrasing or terminology he is using.
So why doesn't the example include some hypothetical trading costs? Without any, it is of less practical value to me. So I guess I will have to rewrite it, inserting some hypothetical costs on my own.
Also, the stock price and the striking price are both cited as being $55. I would've thought the strike price would be higher than the stock price, and that making a profit would depend on the price of the stock rising to match the striking price, and then keep climbing above that in order to go beyond the premium added on top.
Also, the example doesn't mention a premium. It just talks about the call price. So, I'm going to have to go back, establish a standard vocabulary of terms with matching definitions, and then rewrite all the examples so that the language stays consistent.
So as soon as I finish creating my personal options glossary, I will return to this first example.
(I can't imagine why someone like me would exercise the option as opposed to just pocketing the profit while [still] available.)