Well, google did pretty much thatIt's a good question? Why does an IPO have to be under-written by investment banks, whose shares are later sold on the secondary market? Why can't a company just IPO their shares directly to the market themselves? At some point, the original shareholders open bidding to the general market. So why not cut out the middleman? Why is a middleman even needed?
Sorry, that's totally wrong. It would have made extra 38% for the company if IPO price was $93. It's not fair to say that GS did a great job of underwriting if price moves up 38% when trading starts.Dude, you don't know anything about IPOs at all. As 1245 said, it was done perfectly, making an extra 38% for the company (an IPO is to raise money for the company my dear)
1. Most wall street people are not so smart as main street thoughtIt's a good question? Why does an IPO have to be under-written by investment banks, whose shares are later sold on the secondary market? Why can't a company just IPO their shares directly to the market themselves? At some point, the original shareholders open bidding to the general market. So why not cut out the middleman? Why is a middleman even needed?