Oh, you have the same problem as Poetin. Since he lives in Moscow his German is not so good anymore too. And he has problems with Germans too, like you.
Is your first name Vladimir?
Alexis Tsipras' "open letter" to German citizens
- Thread starter Tsing Tao
- Start date
Oh, you have the same problem as Poetin. Since he lives in Moscow his German is not so good anymore too. And he has problems with Germans too, like you.
Is your first name Vladimir?
a) your logic still makes zero sense, "someone is German because one refuses to answer your questions about citizenship".
b) good, then you can sit back and remain silent from now. Little hint: You could have said everything you wanted to say in one sentence and one post. Something else apparently keeps you here which disproves your true intentions.
b) good, then you can sit back and remain silent from now. Little hint: You could have said everything you wanted to say in one sentence and one post. Something else apparently keeps you here which disproves your true intentions.
And yet you send me a private message that points me to a link where you mention in another thread that you are, indeed, German. And I'm the one who lacks logic.
No, actually you wasted all those pages telling me I was arguing something other than that simple point. Go back and read the exchange. I continue to maintain that the money should not have been lent, and will not be repaid. That's it.
Lol, this only proves what a tool you are. Seriously, you repeat yourself over 12 pages and have nothing else to say? Pretty retarded if you ask me.
No, the failure in logic comes from the person who says they won't answer citizenship questions on this forum, and then PMs me a link where they answered it on another thread.
Instead of just answering the question in the first place.I tried that. Your inability to reason prevented you from accepting it until it was drummed into your head over and over again.
Sometimes I have to do that. For example, when I tell my 6 year old that he cannot do something, or I have to explain something to him, it takes repeating over and over again before he can see the light. The mentally challenged require this to learn something, too.
You're welcome!
One more time for you in case you still haven't gotten it: Greece should never have been lent the money, and will never repay the debt in it's current form. That is all I, and Tsipras was saying.
@TsingTao, you are still blatantly wrong, and you can go on as long as you want:
Any and every bailout was granted with strict requirements and legal conditions attached to them, which was that Greece will engage in cost savings measures (aka austerity) and that such will be monitored by a combined body called Troika. When taking into considerations estimates of such cost savings and effects of structural changes the European community very much ran calculations that would have enabled Greece to significantly reduce its debt burden. Nobody every aimed for a 100% reduction, but a decrease from the insane level as percentage of GDP. Such calculations projected a dramatic reduction in debt within the next 10 years.
Stop being for one second the asshole you are and admit that austerity and structural changes do play a vital part in this whole equation.
Nobody ever argued or insisted that Greeks have no choice to follow the prescribed recipe or not. They can choose whatever they want to do. They can choose to go bankrupt if they so like. But they also have to accept the consequences. But this is aside the point.
Main point here is that if you take into consideration the significant effects of savings in government expenditures plus tax reform, plus ,plus plus then yes, the equation makes a lot of sense and Greece can significantly reduce its debt burden.
You are a prick if you pretend this is not an important part of this whole plan. And I say prick because you know perfectly well I am right but are too arrogant to admit it.
Any and every bailout was granted with strict requirements and legal conditions attached to them, which was that Greece will engage in cost savings measures (aka austerity) and that such will be monitored by a combined body called Troika. When taking into considerations estimates of such cost savings and effects of structural changes the European community very much ran calculations that would have enabled Greece to significantly reduce its debt burden. Nobody every aimed for a 100% reduction, but a decrease from the insane level as percentage of GDP. Such calculations projected a dramatic reduction in debt within the next 10 years.
Stop being for one second the asshole you are and admit that austerity and structural changes do play a vital part in this whole equation.
Nobody ever argued or insisted that Greeks have no choice to follow the prescribed recipe or not. They can choose whatever they want to do. They can choose to go bankrupt if they so like. But they also have to accept the consequences. But this is aside the point.
Main point here is that if you take into consideration the significant effects of savings in government expenditures plus tax reform, plus ,plus plus then yes, the equation makes a lot of sense and Greece can significantly reduce its debt burden.
You are a prick if you pretend this is not an important part of this whole plan. And I say prick because you know perfectly well I am right but are too arrogant to admit it.
When you fail at debate, resort to name calling. Is that how the Germans do it? This is why Piezoe stopped his discussion with you in the Japan thread (where you were the expert on Japan, too).
I clearly explained why you are an asshole and prick (here in this thread, I am sure you can be a very likable person in real life...just being positive...). You know perfectly well that someone makes valid points, however, out of sheer arrogance you tax everyone's time and have nothing of value to add other than "Greece cannot repay its debt, it cannot repay its debt". You know full well the argument of the other person and you know it is a value argument but you play dumb. Congratulations. You added 1 sentence of value and 12.99 pages of arrogance.
Whereas you've added 100s of sentences of no value whatsoever, and 12.99 pages of insults.
I'll be happy to discuss other points that you want, if you stop telling me what I'm saying - since I'm the one saying it. If you just want to have a flame war, I can do that, too. Your call, Herr Volpunter.
Hey, you just lost all your value, you clearly stated the only point you wanted to make is that "Greece will not be able to repay its debt". Why should anyone else or I for that matter want to continue to discuss further with you? You ran out of points already on page 1 lol, I was just too dumb to see it.