Alex Castellanos, GOP Strategist: Clinton Speech Was 'Moment That Probably Reelected
- Thread starter Free Thinker
- Start date
+ 1
1) Your post , below certainly gave that implication.
So you admit you were lying about this "most of the people here with whom we would "debate" its merits",?
Seems you don't understand what "would debate it's merits" nor ("potential effects") means or you were lying.
Which is it ?
or better, yet should I just call you rcg
I know , I know ,I already hear your excuse making machine running in overdrive, so I'll save you the effort of another lie /ineffective obfuscation.
You will contend "masterfully written and delivered" were the merits of which you referred thus they (the masterly written reasons) need not be even be mentioned. But what about "potential effects" you mentioned you "would " debate ?
HOLY CRAP
, are you sure rcg didn't coach you through that ?You guys are TOO stupid, it would help if LYING didn't come second nature to you.
Read it and weep mrbill , I caught your team red handed lying again.
:eek:You mean isolationist like putting everybody who disagrees with you (and ultimately laughed their asses off at you when I exposed your silly lies ) on ignore.
Your thought /lies are are completely inept in the free market place of information, therefore you gravitate towards an artificial mechanism to protect your AFFIRMATIVE ACTION world view.
You mean isolationist tendencies like that?
"DOL" boy
Which is it? Decide for yourself:
Guys like you and Lucrum want to discuss a speech you supposedly had not even bothered to listen to. That would make you both idiots. And I'd have to join your ranks if I agreed to "discuss" it with you, just as I'd be a fool to try and carry on a worthwhile discussion with a drunk or lunatic. Consequently, there is, in fact, nothing to discuss with the likes of you. You're just meaningless bugs.
1 ) Face it I caught you in a lie.
2) Now your excuse is the un-named merits as so flimsy as to rely exclusively on whether one heard the speech or not.
What's next only those who heard it "live" are able to discuss these un-named unicorns of "hope".
To hear you tell it,
The merits are so ephemeral that citizens not hypnotized by the speech would ruin their efficacy if attempted to be put into practice .
Just more smoke screen, you're not fooling anyone who can read.
Brass can't mention the merits he's secretly observed.
If he mentions them they go poof and disappear just like when a child makes a wish blowing out his birthday candles.
If he tells another his wish, the wish gets trashed.
If he mentions them they go poof and disappear just like when a child makes a wish blowing out his birthday candles.
If he tells another his wish, the wish gets trashed.
They don't care about the facts about the speech, or anything else but attempting to trash Obama with nonsense, made up right wing noise. We know that, and I think we still try to discuss actual topics, other than where someone lives or works, but they keep digressing back into this cesspool of personal silliness. Too bad, I had hopes for PT, not so much for Lucrum, but we'll have to see how they handle the Mitten's lose in November.