Quote from drjekyllus:
Thats it trefoil, don't debate those who have opposing opinions, just get rid of them. Why don't you just go door to door and collect them and throw them in camps because their ideas are different than yours. Afterall, how can anyone be as smart as you? You are the person who thinks people invented cars to get rid of horseshit. With logic like that, it obvious that you are superior and all voices opposing you should be silenced.
I know you think this is, like, a rilly rilly kewl response.
This is an earlier interaction in this same thread:
insider trading:
With no due respect you are a piece of shit racist that needs to be banned from this site
Aletheia=Magget light BAN BAN BAN BAN !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Aletheia:
You are too kind, but, given the fact you openly and willing endorse illegal and felonious activity via your chosen moniker, perhaps it is you who should banned for setting a bad example.
But thanks for the compliment, nonetheless.
And BTW, it's spelled "realist."
The two things to notice from this are:
1 - Aletheia never denied being Mag Light.
2 - ..and positively enjoyed being called a racist.
I draw the line at racists. I'm willing to debate anyone else on anything else, but not on this.
I'm not the USG, I have no power to throw anyone in a camp, and if I did, I wouldn't use it anyway, being as how I cherish the First Amendment more than any other, the same as the guys who signed the Bill of Rights, who put it first for the same reason.
Mag Light was on my ignore list for using a term I'd only ever seen once before, on a Nazi web site.
If you persist in your line of attack, you'll be on my ignore list as well.
This has nothing to do with your free speech rights. I simply believe that racists should be ignored.
I don't think any laws should be passed against racists, except of course if they put their beliefs into action through criminal or terrorist behavior. I do believe they should be ignored.
This site, meantime, is a private site, and is well within its rights to ban anyone for violating its terms of agreement. The First Amendment only covers government action against speech. It says nothing about what private individuals can do.
This is not and never has been a question of free speech. That's a diversion, and I'm quite sure you know it.
It's a question of decency. We will see if you have any.
The only way i can interperate the above paragraph is that you feel like LESS of a loser because you only lost 2k.... does this sound about right?
Good work, now take a union job where being "LESS" of a loser might hold some value, unfortunately for you 90% of society knows that a loser is a loser and it doesnt matter if you lost LESS] than the next guy. 100% of actual traders know that your line is horseshit, losing still makes you totally incompetent. Most people do not like "losers" Imagine if funds started sending in their returns and their retort was "yeah wel i lost LESS than this fund did," I am absolutely positive that would work out for them.