Quote from bungrider:
To name this thread "Al Quaeda buys gold stocks" is moronic, since you don't have any proof that this is the case.
Everytime a market moves, are you going to start some thread about someone whom you IMAGINE to be a player in that market doing something which, in retrospect, seems to make sense to you?
So if the dollar comes down, will you say "Soros is shorting more $$$"??
No.
But - is saying "Maybe Soros is shorting more $$$" any more thought-stimulating than "Soros is shorting more $$$" ? In any case, I don't pretend to be objective; anybody who does is deluded.
Must we have "proof" before we take positions - especially on issues for which proof is never likely to be available?