excuse me, i am simply NOT disappointed by Al Gore.Quote from TM_Direct:
And yet you continue to respond with....nothing...nada...no points no evidence...no answer...you just type words in an attempt to save face.
i think he is very authentic and has been spending
much time and energy for a noble cause. you think
that a former vice president is not allowed to speak
about energy consumption when he spends 8times
the average. but i think you are missing the entire
point of his endeavour if you dismiss it that easily.
so, i respect that you have a different opinion than
me, but you seem to be unable to accept that i am
not willing to repeat what you believe in.
now, again, "points" and "evidence". if global warming
is a serious threat (and if you do not believe that gore
truly believes it, than stop replying, please.), than it is
for the benefit of all that al gore makes the issue heard
all over the globe, no matter if he spends the avg or
eight times of that. this is pure logic. if survival is the
utility function and al gore ensures it, than the cost
of him doing so is almost irrelevant. i prefer having
him pointing it out to some professor who consumes
1/8th of the average citizen and reaches twenty people
per year.
now, maybe you could refer to this argument, which
you have failed so far by claiming there is none.
http://elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=88276&perpage=6&pagenumber=4
you just do not want to hear what i say. but i guess
i am hardly the one to blame for this.
