sorry to have hurt your feelings....
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Al Gore is a loser (Video Proof)
- Thread starter trader1966
- Start date
sorry to have hurt your feelings....
Quote from man:
there are different stages of illiteracy.
Thats right when you have absolutely nothing else insult my spelling cause i really give a shit if i spell properly for some dyke on an internet forum who claims to be a "MAN".
Oh yeah and for future reference just so you know, generally when someone puts "hahahahaha" in the middle of a sentence they arent trying to get a hero cookie for spelling.
You are fairly clueless and are embarrassing yourself without even knowing it. Why not read those two posts again and then get an adult to connect the dots for you.Quote from PORNSTAR69371:
more left wing hypocrites hahahahahaha now slowly remove you foot from your mouth.
right on the exact same page too, so it was alright for scientists to be wrong about global cooling but not smoking hey??? boy the left sure has things figured out, sounds quite similar to gore and his crusade for global warming, all the while usng 8 times more energy than the average person.
And now that you have opened the door to insults, let me just say this: unless you have an oxygen tank up your ass, I have no idea how you manage to breathe.
Next time you are flipping through your "ROLIDEX OF INSULTS TO MAKE YOU LOOK INTELLIGENT ON INTERNET FORUMS" make sure you turn it over after using one, it doesnt work twice on the same thread.
So basically when the people who fuck up on global cooling turn around and start pitching global warming that is ok, but the people who fucked up on smoking and who are now against global warming are big republican fat cat corrupt morons??
I really dont think i am missing anything here....... thx to you... you are doing a PHENOMENAL job demonstrating the leftwing hypocrisy which Al Gore and his buddies have done such a bangup job of laying down for you. keep up the good work!
you really are incompetent as you have proven on this thread numerous times, just quit talking while you still have a shred of dignity left.
First we have
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1499942#post1499942
Hey thunderdog why dont you kindly get somebody to connect the........ wait a minute havent i heard this one before???
So basically when the people who fuck up on global cooling turn around and start pitching global warming that is ok, but the people who fucked up on smoking and who are now against global warming are big republican fat cat corrupt morons??
I really dont think i am missing anything here....... thx to you... you are doing a PHENOMENAL job demonstrating the leftwing hypocrisy which Al Gore and his buddies have done such a bangup job of laying down for you. keep up the good work!
you really are incompetent as you have proven on this thread numerous times, just quit talking while you still have a shred of dignity left.
First we have
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1499942#post1499942
Quote from Thunderdog:
Why don't you find a kindly adult to connect the dots for you. You seem to have missed the whole point of my post that you referred to. (I can only guess that you voted for Bush both times.)
Quote from Thunderdog:
You are fairly clueless and are embarrassing yourself without even knowing it. Why not read those two posts again and then get an adult to connect the dots for you.
Hey thunderdog why dont you kindly get somebody to connect the........ wait a minute havent i heard this one before???
neophyte321
Guest
Quote from man:
got the message. just can help one final comment: you
do not really believe that "the Loserishness of Gore" is
really ... a "topic"? i mean which other title of a thread
could be a better invitation on bash-bash than that?
"discussion"? no way ... and did i ... yeah, i did.
OK, call me weak, I have to respond....
This guy goes on and on and on and on about the evils of the world, and in this very thread he wishes us all dead ...
This guy is a psychotherapists wet-dream... provided of course he has insurance that covers junk-science ...
I'm typing this slowly for your benefit.Quote from PORNSTAR69371:
...So basically when the people who fuck up on global cooling turn around and start pitching global warming that is ok, but the people who fucked up on smoking and who are now against global warming are big republican fat cat corrupt morons??
The scientists never "fucked up" on smoking. They knew for a very, very long time that it was carcinogenic. However, that wouldn't do now, would it? Therefore, the tobacco companies got mercenary lobbyists who would sell their mothers for the right price to create obfuscation along with scientists who had their price. In case you were sleeping, this all came out a while back. They have been exposed for what they were. The tobacco companies' scientists and their lobbyists were SOBs without peer. They knew the score but they did and said what the purse strings told them to. In a video previously noted in a global warming thread some months ago, the lobbyists and scientists who worked on behalf of the tobacco companies were named. Coincidentally, many of the same mercenaries are now doing their business on global warming. Are the dots coming together for you now?
The climatologists were putting their research out with the best of intentions. People make mistakes, and honest mistakes are understandable. The tobacco lobbyists and scientists said whatever needed to be said to sell cigarettes and avoid lawsuits. Period. Do you see how that works? Which one do you think is wearing the plaid jacket and trying to sell you a Ford Pinto?
Does it not trouble you that the Bush administration has actually limited what government scientists are allowed to report? That political functionaries are editing scientific research that they probably don't even comprehend? Does that not sound any alarm bells for you? No previous administration has ever clamped down on the government's own scientists in this way.
OMG i knew you were gonna play that game and say that you were referring to lobbyists but really the conversation was referring to SCIENTISTS and you know it, and YOU WERE THE ONE who turned it around and tried to call the anti global warming SCIENTISTS "lobbyists" and put an automatic negative spin on them quite typical, you lefties are sooooo fucking easy to predict. Oh and by the way at the end of the first paragraph here you admitted you were wrong by once again saying the SCIENTISTS with smoking went to global warming. Is it not possible that since the evidence they had at the time was inconclusive they did not jump to conclusions?? Can you 100% GUARANTEE GLOBAL WARMING TO ME RIGHT NOW???
Now i am sure you will say something as stupid as "everyone knows smoking is bad for you" but hindsight is 20/20, and with that kind of logic you could tell a neanderthal that creating fire was easy, duhhhhh.
You stuck your foot in your mouth and are unwilling to admit it.
WTF was the point of the post then?? please tell me.... based on the conversation you were trying to discredit scientists who dont believe in global warming saying that these evil lobbyists control them, you are pretty thick man, a retard can spot whats going on here, oh wait better not use that word with all the lefties in here.....
Dont play games with words.
And btw wtf is your obsession with dots?? did you stare at the sun to long??
Good work on flipping the ROLIDEX however if your next insult is as weak as "I am typing slowly so you understand" you should just skip that one as well.
Now i am sure you will say something as stupid as "everyone knows smoking is bad for you" but hindsight is 20/20, and with that kind of logic you could tell a neanderthal that creating fire was easy, duhhhhh.
You stuck your foot in your mouth and are unwilling to admit it.
WTF was the point of the post then?? please tell me.... based on the conversation you were trying to discredit scientists who dont believe in global warming saying that these evil lobbyists control them, you are pretty thick man, a retard can spot whats going on here, oh wait better not use that word with all the lefties in here.....
Dont play games with words.
And btw wtf is your obsession with dots?? did you stare at the sun to long??
Good work on flipping the ROLIDEX however if your next insult is as weak as "I am typing slowly so you understand" you should just skip that one as well.
Quote from Thunderdog:
I'm typing this slowly for your benefit.
The scientists never "fucked up" on smoking. They knew for a very, very long time that it was carcinogenic. However, that wouldn't do now, would it? Therefore, the tobacco companies got mercenary lobbyists who would sell their mothers for the right price to create obfuscation along with scientists who had their price. In case you were sleeping, this all came out a while back. They have been exposed for what they were. The tobacco companies' scientists and their lobbyists were SOBs without peer. They knew the score but they did and said what the purse strings told them to. In a video previously noted in a global warming thread some months ago, the lobbyists and scientists who worked on behalf of the tobacco companies were named. Coincidentally, many of the same mercenaries are now doing their business on global warming. Are the dots coming together for you now?
The climatologists were putting their research out with the best of intentions. People make mistakes, and honest mistakes are understandable. The tobacco lobbyists and scientists said whatever needed to be said to sell cigarettes and avoid lawsuits. Period. Do you see how that works? Which one do you think is wearing the plaid jacket and trying to sell you a Ford Pinto?
Does it not trouble you that the Bush administration has actually limited what government scientists are allowed to report? That political functionaries are editing scientific research that they probably don't even comprehend? Does that not sound any alarm bells for you? No previous administration has ever clamped down on the government's own scientists in this way.
Ya know, it is a fact proven beyond any possible reasonable doubt that the first person to call the other person in an internet discussion a "retard" is losing the argument.
But hey, you are winning the race, right?
What troubles me though, is not your juvenile selection of words and abuse of the English language, that is to be expected from an uneducated person rethugniklan who likely suckled on a mercury filled lead pacifier as an infant, but rather that the very public announcement of a New Year's resolution by TK9 was so quickly violated, and now he is found to be arguing with someone who glosses himself as PORNSTAR69371, and a quick Google of that name, PORNSTAR69371, reveals this:
http://www.rivalfish.com/rivalroom/uploaded_images/boner-766297.jpg
But hey, you are winning the race, right?
What troubles me though, is not your juvenile selection of words and abuse of the English language, that is to be expected from an uneducated person rethugniklan who likely suckled on a mercury filled lead pacifier as an infant, but rather that the very public announcement of a New Year's resolution by TK9 was so quickly violated, and now he is found to be arguing with someone who glosses himself as PORNSTAR69371, and a quick Google of that name, PORNSTAR69371, reveals this:
http://www.rivalfish.com/rivalroom/uploaded_images/boner-766297.jpg
Quote from PORNSTAR69371:
OMG i knew you were gonna play that game and say that you were referring to lobbyists but really the conversation was referring to SCIENTISTS and you know it, and YOU WERE THE ONE who turned it around and tried to call the anti global warming SCIENTISTS "lobbyists" and put an automatic negative spin on them quite typical, you lefties are sooooo fucking easy to predict. Oh and by the way at the end of the first paragraph here you admitted you were wrong by once again saying the SCIENTISTS with smoking went to global warming. Is it not possible that since the evidence they had at the time was inconclusive they did not jump to conclusions?? Can you 100% GUARANTEE GLOBAL WARMING TO ME RIGHT NOW???
Now i am sure you will say something as stupid as "everyone knows smoking is bad for you" but hindsight is 20/20, and with that kind of logic you could tell a neanderthal that creating fire was easy, duhhhhh.
You stuck your foot in your mouth and are unwilling to admit it.
WTF was the point of the post then?? please tell me.... based on the conversation you were trying to discredit scientists who dont believe in global warming saying that these evil lobbyists control them, you are pretty thick man, a retard can spot whats going on here, oh wait better not use that word with all the lefties in here.....
Dont play games with words.
And btw wtf is your obsession with dots?? did you stare at the sun to long??
Good work on flipping the ROLIDEX however if your next insult is as weak as "I am typing slowly so you understand" you should just skip that one as well.
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:
Ya know, it is a fact proven beyond any possible reasonable doubt that the first person to call the other person in an internet discussion a "retard" is losing the argument.
But hey, you are winning the race, right?
you say this and then post a picture off of one of the sites you subscribe to with a man with a boner flexing his arm...... BOY YOU SURE GOT ME......you better quit paying for subscriptions to sites like that or you will run out of capital, we all know you could not trade a porsche for a cavalier, let alone stock.