Al Gore - Democratic Party candidate in 2008.
- Thread starter SouthAmerica
- Start date
SA you are a stunning example of how liberalism leads to losing touch with reality. Conspiracyboy88 is one type of example where he sees everything as a conspiracy and himself as the only one smart enough to figure these conspiracies out.
You on the other hand, see yourself as a doom and gloom prophet where only you can see the great disasters awaiting mankind. Unlike conspiracyboy88 however, I think there is yet hope for you. First you need to stop frequenting places like Daily Kos, Democrat Underground, etc. Then you must quit politics completely - cold turkey. Then get a couple of hobbies to pass your extra time and take up an intense sport to exhaust your anxieties every few days. Maybe after a few years you can begin to dabble in politics again with a clearer mind and you won't so easily be swept away into grand delusions of doom prophecy if things don't go your way. Good luck...
.
April 9, 2008
SouthAmerica: Al Gore is getting momentum and his potential nomination is on its way to become a reality. Here is another nice article published on The New York Times about Al Gore.
Slowly the smart people are realizing that Al Gore is the best option for the Democratic Party to field in November of 2008.
I have no doubt on my mind that Al Gore can win the election in November 2008, and he can win with a strong mandate.
Al Gore should stay on the sidelines and he should not endorse either candidate, and he should be prepared to answer the call when he is drafted at the Democratic Party convention.
*****
âCalling Al Goreâ
By Dan Schnur
The New York Times â April 9, 2008
Dan Schnur was the national communications director for John McCainâs presidential campaign in 2000
Looking back at a week in which the most widely covered news to emerge from the campaign trail is that former presidents tend to write books and give speeches for large amounts of money, and that campaign consultants who undermine their bossâ key policy positions for personal profit tend to be fired, it may be worthwhile to consider where a Democratic primary based more on personal than ideological differences may eventually conclude.
So prepare yourself for more weeks of boxing and bowling, of incendiary preachers and invisible snipers, and of declining favorability ratings for the two candidates and increasing numbers of Democratic primary voters indicating a willingness to vote for Senator John McCain in the fall if their preferred candidate does not receive the nomination.
The question isnât whether Democrats will come together behind the eventual nominee: judging by recent polling, the level of anger toward the current president among party regulars is such that they could decide the nomination on Halloween and still be a united force by election day. But the moderates, independents and even renegade Republicans who were thinking nice things about Senator Obama earlier this year are not nearly as favorably disposed to him anymore. And in the absence of large-scale policy distinctions between the two candidates, the personal nature of their exchanges are more likely to result in lasting damage. Itâs one thing to argue about the cost of two health care programs: itâs a bigger problem to be taking potshots at the honesty, integrity and experience of your opponent.
Any number of top Democrats have attempted to step in and bring some order to this process, but none possess the stature to help the candidates, the superdelegates and the rest of the party structure come together. Former President Bill Clinton is compromised, of course, former nominee John Kerry has been marginalized and most other high-level Democrats have already endorsed a candidate, undermining their credentials as impartial brokers.
Speaker Nancy Pelosi tried to step into the leadership void, only to be slapped down by a group of party donors when she tried to steer the conversation in a particular direction. That type of reproach would have been a step up for Howard Dean, the chairman of the Democratic National Committee, whose sporadic efforts to provide direction have been widely ignored. Speaker-in-waiting Rahm Emmanuel has strong links with both camps, but itâs unlikely that heâd risk his future by alienating either Mrs. Clinton or Mr. Obama.
The one Democrat who does possess the stature to provide the needed guidance is former Vice President Al Gore. While there have been rumors about his interest in Senator Obama, and age-old tales about tensions between him and Senator Clinton, the fact that he has not endorsed either candidate provides him with the necessary credibility that an honest broker requires. The disputed outcome of the 2000 election bestows not only respect on him, but virtual political martyrdom. Neither the Obama nor Clinton campaigns could ignore his pressure without risking sizable backlash from Democratic voters â and delegates.
Mr. Gore has been understandably coy about taking on the role of power broker. Heâs had a historically tenuous relationship with the party establishment, and thereâs an inherent risk that the supporters of the losing candidate blame him for any real or imagined role in the outcome. And thereâs certainly nothing to be gained by weighing in at this particular moment. Unless the Pennsylvania primary results in an extended winning streak for Senator Clinton, this problem could solve itself. But if the primary calendar heads into the latter weeks of May without resolution, the need for someone of Mr. Goreâs standing to engage will become much greater.
Should the nomination remain unresolved by that point, though, the question for Democrats is whether they would prefer to have Al Gore as their referee â or as their nominee. If anything, the former vice presidentâs stature has only been enhanced since his own campaign eight years ago. His work to raise public awareness of global warming may be an unprecedented achievement in modern American history. It has netted him an Oscar, a Grammy, an Emmy and a Nobel Prize, and the enhanced respect of his partyâs voters. When he was interviewed on â60 Minutesâ recently, Mr. Gore seemed a lot more interested in his media campaign on behalf of his favorite issue than presidential politics. But he also seemed underwhelmed by the amount of attention that global warming was getting from the current candidates.
In his book, âPolitics Lost,â Joe Klein recalls conversations he had with senior advisers to Mr. Goreâs 2000 campaign. They told him of the pressure they put on Mr. Gore not to talk about environmental issues, given the problems it could cause him in Rust Belt states like Pennsylvania and Michigan. Mr. Klein reasonably suggests that one of the reasons that Al Gore seemed so uncomfortable as a candidate was that he was forbidden to discuss the public policy challenge that served as one of his primary motivations for running for office.
Eight years later, Mr. Gore is more comfortable in his own skin and more confident in talking about the issues that are important to him. Like Senator Clinton, he evokes positive memories of the 1990s, but without the divisiveness that has hampered her campaign. Like Senator Obama, he opposed the Iraq war from the beginning, but with much more authority and consistency than a speech from the Illinois Legislature. He has avoided the mud that has splashed on both of them as the primaries have gotten nastier. And he has more experience in politics and government than the two of them combined, a handy attribute in a contest against John McCain.
In short, heâs a fairly major asset for the Democratic Party to leave on the shelf during such a critical election season. Wonder if heâll stay there?
Source: http://campaignstops.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/08/calling-al-gore/?hp
.
April 9, 2008
SouthAmerica: Al Gore is getting momentum and his potential nomination is on its way to become a reality. Here is another nice article published on The New York Times about Al Gore.
Slowly the smart people are realizing that Al Gore is the best option for the Democratic Party to field in November of 2008.
I have no doubt on my mind that Al Gore can win the election in November 2008, and he can win with a strong mandate.
Al Gore should stay on the sidelines and he should not endorse either candidate, and he should be prepared to answer the call when he is drafted at the Democratic Party convention.
*****
âCalling Al Goreâ
By Dan Schnur
The New York Times â April 9, 2008
Dan Schnur was the national communications director for John McCainâs presidential campaign in 2000
Looking back at a week in which the most widely covered news to emerge from the campaign trail is that former presidents tend to write books and give speeches for large amounts of money, and that campaign consultants who undermine their bossâ key policy positions for personal profit tend to be fired, it may be worthwhile to consider where a Democratic primary based more on personal than ideological differences may eventually conclude.
So prepare yourself for more weeks of boxing and bowling, of incendiary preachers and invisible snipers, and of declining favorability ratings for the two candidates and increasing numbers of Democratic primary voters indicating a willingness to vote for Senator John McCain in the fall if their preferred candidate does not receive the nomination.
The question isnât whether Democrats will come together behind the eventual nominee: judging by recent polling, the level of anger toward the current president among party regulars is such that they could decide the nomination on Halloween and still be a united force by election day. But the moderates, independents and even renegade Republicans who were thinking nice things about Senator Obama earlier this year are not nearly as favorably disposed to him anymore. And in the absence of large-scale policy distinctions between the two candidates, the personal nature of their exchanges are more likely to result in lasting damage. Itâs one thing to argue about the cost of two health care programs: itâs a bigger problem to be taking potshots at the honesty, integrity and experience of your opponent.
Any number of top Democrats have attempted to step in and bring some order to this process, but none possess the stature to help the candidates, the superdelegates and the rest of the party structure come together. Former President Bill Clinton is compromised, of course, former nominee John Kerry has been marginalized and most other high-level Democrats have already endorsed a candidate, undermining their credentials as impartial brokers.
Speaker Nancy Pelosi tried to step into the leadership void, only to be slapped down by a group of party donors when she tried to steer the conversation in a particular direction. That type of reproach would have been a step up for Howard Dean, the chairman of the Democratic National Committee, whose sporadic efforts to provide direction have been widely ignored. Speaker-in-waiting Rahm Emmanuel has strong links with both camps, but itâs unlikely that heâd risk his future by alienating either Mrs. Clinton or Mr. Obama.
The one Democrat who does possess the stature to provide the needed guidance is former Vice President Al Gore. While there have been rumors about his interest in Senator Obama, and age-old tales about tensions between him and Senator Clinton, the fact that he has not endorsed either candidate provides him with the necessary credibility that an honest broker requires. The disputed outcome of the 2000 election bestows not only respect on him, but virtual political martyrdom. Neither the Obama nor Clinton campaigns could ignore his pressure without risking sizable backlash from Democratic voters â and delegates.
Mr. Gore has been understandably coy about taking on the role of power broker. Heâs had a historically tenuous relationship with the party establishment, and thereâs an inherent risk that the supporters of the losing candidate blame him for any real or imagined role in the outcome. And thereâs certainly nothing to be gained by weighing in at this particular moment. Unless the Pennsylvania primary results in an extended winning streak for Senator Clinton, this problem could solve itself. But if the primary calendar heads into the latter weeks of May without resolution, the need for someone of Mr. Goreâs standing to engage will become much greater.
Should the nomination remain unresolved by that point, though, the question for Democrats is whether they would prefer to have Al Gore as their referee â or as their nominee. If anything, the former vice presidentâs stature has only been enhanced since his own campaign eight years ago. His work to raise public awareness of global warming may be an unprecedented achievement in modern American history. It has netted him an Oscar, a Grammy, an Emmy and a Nobel Prize, and the enhanced respect of his partyâs voters. When he was interviewed on â60 Minutesâ recently, Mr. Gore seemed a lot more interested in his media campaign on behalf of his favorite issue than presidential politics. But he also seemed underwhelmed by the amount of attention that global warming was getting from the current candidates.
In his book, âPolitics Lost,â Joe Klein recalls conversations he had with senior advisers to Mr. Goreâs 2000 campaign. They told him of the pressure they put on Mr. Gore not to talk about environmental issues, given the problems it could cause him in Rust Belt states like Pennsylvania and Michigan. Mr. Klein reasonably suggests that one of the reasons that Al Gore seemed so uncomfortable as a candidate was that he was forbidden to discuss the public policy challenge that served as one of his primary motivations for running for office.
Eight years later, Mr. Gore is more comfortable in his own skin and more confident in talking about the issues that are important to him. Like Senator Clinton, he evokes positive memories of the 1990s, but without the divisiveness that has hampered her campaign. Like Senator Obama, he opposed the Iraq war from the beginning, but with much more authority and consistency than a speech from the Illinois Legislature. He has avoided the mud that has splashed on both of them as the primaries have gotten nastier. And he has more experience in politics and government than the two of them combined, a handy attribute in a contest against John McCain.
In short, heâs a fairly major asset for the Democratic Party to leave on the shelf during such a critical election season. Wonder if heâll stay there?
Source: http://campaignstops.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/08/calling-al-gore/?hp
.
