SA keeps harping on the Al Gore thing when it is quite obvious the guy isn't running. If he was, he'd be raising funds. He has lots of his own cash from Google stock, but I doubt he'd burn it. And by the way, he didn't make that documentary, he acted in it. No big cash horde there.
Also, I've seen via TV, and read several places where people that know him well say there is no way he'd run against the Clintons. He understands first hand how nasty they can be.
As for a Republican in the Oval Office again, I agree. A majority of Americans want change, especially after this nutty war, but the fact remains that the Dems are once again going to nominate an unelectable candidate. Hillary? Fully half the population despises her. Obama? Not enough experience, but he'll be a force down the road. Edwards? Full on socialist. WAY too far left.
IF the Repubs nominate Rudy, he runs away with it. Regardless of some of his personal issues, America generally loves the guy. He would take NY and maybe even Cal. Repubs rarely can do that.
McCain could lose to anyone due to his war views, but I believe this will prevent him from landing the nomination.
Romney? Hasn't even started his massively planned advertising to introduce himself to the nation. He is impressive as hell, super successful, speaks really well, and "looks" presidential. The one anchor he drags is his religion. Yanks tend to fear Mormons. For those of you who don't know much about the guy, he was a cofounder of Bain Capital, one of the largest hedge funds/ private equity firms in the country. He has access to an endless stream of cash through his numerous Wall St connections.
Therefore, no Gore, and Repubs win again unless the war turns and McCain slides into the nomination. Ironic.