Al Gore - Democratic Party candidate in 2008.
- Thread starter SouthAmerica
- Start date
And since you crave attention, you are going to start recycling your worn out materials until someone notices you?
.
August 21, 2008
SouthAmerica: Five months ago I already knew that Barack Obama was going to lose the presidential election in November 2008, but the talking heads on television it seem to me that they are surprised that at this stage of the game Obama is running neck a neck with McCain.
The Democratic Party lost this election a long time ago â And as I have been saying all along this was nothing more than an experiment that is going to cost the blacks and woman a very high price.
This is becoming a pathetic place anyway, and the Democratic Party deserved to lose this election for lack of vision about what it was at stake and the cost of losing such an election â and they decided to go for the experiment anyway.
Now the Democratic Party just have to learn how to live for a long time into the future with a Supreme Court far to the right â and that will happen when President John McCain nominates the next 2 people to that court.
I knew all along that Barack Obama was going to lose the presidential race and I donât need to wait until November 2008 to figure that one out.
Here is what I wrote on this thread on April 1, 2008.
******
April 1, 2008
Here are some of the possibilities that the talking heads can talk about after the election and the political analysts can write about after the Democratic Party defeat in November 2008:
1) Why the Democratic Party lost the election?
2) The self-destruction of the Democratic Party in 2008.
3) Here is why the Democratic Party split along the lines of gender and race and the party imploded before the general election of 2008.
4) The Democratic Party thought that bringing race as an issue it would work on its favor in the presidential election of 2008, and instead the race issue ended up splitting the country for years to come.
5) The Democratic Party thought that they would make history by electing the first woman or the first black man as president of the United States. But instead the Democratic Party lost an election that was on the bag.
6) The Democratic Party wanted to make political history in November 2008 by electing the first woman or the first black man, but instead they made another type of history since a Republican Party victory in November 2008 allowed that party the opportunity to push the Supreme Court all the way to the radical right.
7) The Democratic Party and the presidential election of 2008; a classic case study about how to win a battle, and lose the war.
I could go on and on⦠But I hope you guys got the point.
If Al Gore is drafted at the Democratic Party convention as the nominee for the general election â I am sure Al Gore can win that election in November 2008 with a strong mandate.
You donât have to be a rocket scientist to observe the obvious that Hillary and Obama canât win the general election in November 2008, because they are both damaged goods and the situation on the Democratic Party is beyond repair before the general election.
The Republican Party must be glad that the Democratic Party canât figure out even the most obvious things.
Source: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=74835&perpage=6&pagenumber=87
.
August 21, 2008
SouthAmerica: Five months ago I already knew that Barack Obama was going to lose the presidential election in November 2008, but the talking heads on television it seem to me that they are surprised that at this stage of the game Obama is running neck a neck with McCain.
The Democratic Party lost this election a long time ago â And as I have been saying all along this was nothing more than an experiment that is going to cost the blacks and woman a very high price.
This is becoming a pathetic place anyway, and the Democratic Party deserved to lose this election for lack of vision about what it was at stake and the cost of losing such an election â and they decided to go for the experiment anyway.
Now the Democratic Party just have to learn how to live for a long time into the future with a Supreme Court far to the right â and that will happen when President John McCain nominates the next 2 people to that court.
I knew all along that Barack Obama was going to lose the presidential race and I donât need to wait until November 2008 to figure that one out.
Here is what I wrote on this thread on April 1, 2008.
******
April 1, 2008
Here are some of the possibilities that the talking heads can talk about after the election and the political analysts can write about after the Democratic Party defeat in November 2008:
1) Why the Democratic Party lost the election?
2) The self-destruction of the Democratic Party in 2008.
3) Here is why the Democratic Party split along the lines of gender and race and the party imploded before the general election of 2008.
4) The Democratic Party thought that bringing race as an issue it would work on its favor in the presidential election of 2008, and instead the race issue ended up splitting the country for years to come.
5) The Democratic Party thought that they would make history by electing the first woman or the first black man as president of the United States. But instead the Democratic Party lost an election that was on the bag.
6) The Democratic Party wanted to make political history in November 2008 by electing the first woman or the first black man, but instead they made another type of history since a Republican Party victory in November 2008 allowed that party the opportunity to push the Supreme Court all the way to the radical right.
7) The Democratic Party and the presidential election of 2008; a classic case study about how to win a battle, and lose the war.
I could go on and on⦠But I hope you guys got the point.
If Al Gore is drafted at the Democratic Party convention as the nominee for the general election â I am sure Al Gore can win that election in November 2008 with a strong mandate.
You donât have to be a rocket scientist to observe the obvious that Hillary and Obama canât win the general election in November 2008, because they are both damaged goods and the situation on the Democratic Party is beyond repair before the general election.
The Republican Party must be glad that the Democratic Party canât figure out even the most obvious things.
Source: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=74835&perpage=6&pagenumber=87
.
You donât have to be a rocket scientist to observe the obvious that Hillary and Obama canât win the general election in November 2008, because they are both damaged goods and the situation on the Democratic Party is beyond repair before the general election.
=========================================
Al gore isn't????? HE IS A TWO TIME LOSER FOR PRESIDENT!!!
he is so far to the left that even dems are afraid of him....
=========================================
Al gore isn't????? HE IS A TWO TIME LOSER FOR PRESIDENT!!!
he is so far to the left that even dems are afraid of him....
.
TM Direct: Al gore isn't????? HE IS A TWO TIME LOSER FOR PRESIDENT!!!
he is so far to the left that even dems are afraid of him....
******
August 21, 2008
SouthAmerica: Reply to TM Direct
As far as I know Al Gore is not running for president in November 2008.
But Barack Obama is, and he is going to lose the election in November 2008.
At this point please explain to me the connection of Al Gore's losing his presidential race in the past has to do with Barack Obama losing the coming election in November 2008?
The only connection is that both men were representing the Democratic Party - and that the Democratic Party has become an expert of losing elections that were almost impossible to lose.
Even with the US economy going down the toilet - The US is almost in an economic depression and the Democrats are so dumb that they are in the process of losing another election.
Right now the Democratic Party is so incompetent that they probably would manage to lose even a rigged election in Zimbabwe if they were running an election in that country.
.
TM Direct: Al gore isn't????? HE IS A TWO TIME LOSER FOR PRESIDENT!!!
he is so far to the left that even dems are afraid of him....
******
August 21, 2008
SouthAmerica: Reply to TM Direct
As far as I know Al Gore is not running for president in November 2008.
But Barack Obama is, and he is going to lose the election in November 2008.
At this point please explain to me the connection of Al Gore's losing his presidential race in the past has to do with Barack Obama losing the coming election in November 2008?
The only connection is that both men were representing the Democratic Party - and that the Democratic Party has become an expert of losing elections that were almost impossible to lose.
Even with the US economy going down the toilet - The US is almost in an economic depression and the Democrats are so dumb that they are in the process of losing another election.
Right now the Democratic Party is so incompetent that they probably would manage to lose even a rigged election in Zimbabwe if they were running an election in that country.
.
there is a great connection...Al Gore while representing the Dem party couldn;t win in 2000 with a stong economy, 8 years as VP and no war........so why would he make a better candidate then BO right now? BO is at least a fresh face on the scene with a lot less ties to DC then the others.
.
August 23, 2008
SouthAmerica: If I was in John McCainâs shoes at this point I would go for the final kill.
I would make a deal with Hillary Clinton and would place her as the Vice President on his ticket.
John McCain would be a one-term president and at that point she steps in and would be the favorite to win the election in 2012.
With Hillary Clinton on his ticket as the VP that would be enough to put McCain over the top in many states that could go either way in 2008.
The deal that John McCain can make with Hillary is that he would appoint middle of the road people to the Supreme Court instead of going completely to the radical right.
I know McCain would lose some conservative votes if he did that, but he might win a lot more women votes and independent votes to make up for the loss.
.
August 23, 2008
SouthAmerica: If I was in John McCainâs shoes at this point I would go for the final kill.
I would make a deal with Hillary Clinton and would place her as the Vice President on his ticket.
John McCain would be a one-term president and at that point she steps in and would be the favorite to win the election in 2012.
With Hillary Clinton on his ticket as the VP that would be enough to put McCain over the top in many states that could go either way in 2008.
The deal that John McCain can make with Hillary is that he would appoint middle of the road people to the Supreme Court instead of going completely to the radical right.
I know McCain would lose some conservative votes if he did that, but he might win a lot more women votes and independent votes to make up for the loss.
.
do you drink ??? are you high???
LMAO
with that rational...OB should make condi rice his VP choice ...LOL
mccain wouldn't just lose conserv. votes...he'd lose repub. votes and most likely the RNC would strip him of his votes and do a floor vote and draft for someone else....
you need to stop drinking
