Al Brooks Trading Best Pice Action

Quote from marketsurfer:

Why would a computer need to read a "bar". Aren't you inherently mixing subjective with objective in an illogical and faulty manner?

Something does not compute.

Surf

Surf, first off allow me to give you a computer lesson. Lord knows you could use one. Computers only do what that are told. We teach them, through software to perform tasks for us. If a computer is taught to read a chart or a bar it is an objective task. Computer's don't perform subjective operations . . . yet.

Surf, I mean Surf I totally understand why reading a bar would seemingly be subjective to you, Surf. I mean why would anything ever have an objective meaning, right Surf? I mean, Surf, you are the master of spoonerisms.

What doesn't compute Surf is your ability to understand logic as a completely objective environment.

Did I mention your name enough in my post, Surf? I mean you like to see your name, Surf, mentioned a lot so I thought you would enjoy this, Surf.
 
Quote from marketsurfer:

Furthermore, as you correctly assume that the big players move the market ( they make bars) --- why study the bars ( your word) rather than starting with the major price driver of the big players? Studying price alone is irrational, counterproductive and actually backwards.

How's studying those "major price drivers" working out for you? I mean your last trade was what, nearly a $100,000.00 loss (that includes the trade you posted and then deleted before you thought anyone saw it). Play money or real it was an ignorant trade I told you BEFORE THE FACT wasn't going to work.

What is irrational, counterproductive and backward is listening to anything you have to say.

Any chance of you heading back to your own journal and cleaning up the mess you left there before starting any more arguments that are miles outside your knowledge base?
 
Quote from RCG Trader:

Just when I thought I had you down cold, I learn something new. So when determining average volume how many days do you use to extrapolate the average? My first instinct would be 20.

For some markets and stocks the data feeds will usually list "Average Daily Volume". You know I have my own way of viewing volume on a chart that doesn't need those averages. That being said I can see where you and LF would benefit for starting from a point of Averages.

Let me know if you have a problem finding them and I will see if I can help.
 
Quote from xiaodre:

How do you go about looking for the footprint of the big players?

You can start with the COT report.... Larry Williams book on the subject is a good place to begin learning. Good luck, surf
 
Quote from ProfLogic:

How's studying those "major price drivers" working out for you? I mean your last trade was what, nearly a $100,000.00 loss (that includes the trade you posted and then deleted before you thought anyone saw it). Play money or real it was an ignorant trade I told you BEFORE THE FACT wasn't going to work.

What is irrational, counterproductive and backward is listening to anything you have to say.

Any chance of you heading back to your own journal and cleaning up the mess you left there before starting any more arguments that are miles outside your knowledge base?


Yes, I have losing trades and have got over confident at times. ( unlike the perfect record (near) you had posted on your site for a number of years.

Still waiting on the objective program for testing. September is getting close.

Surf Surf
 
Quote from ProfLogic:

Surf, first off allow me to give you a computer lesson. Lord knows you could use one. Computers only do what that are told. We teach them, through software to perform tasks for us. If a computer is taught to read a chart or a bar it is an objective task. Computer's don't perform subjective operations . . . yet.

Surf, I mean Surf I totally understand why reading a bar would seemingly be subjective to you, Surf. I mean why would anything ever have an objective meaning, right Surf? I mean, Surf, you are the master of spoonerisms.

What doesn't compute Surf is your ability to understand logic as a completely objective environment.

Did I mention your name enough in my post, Surf? I mean you like to see your name, Surf, mentioned a lot so I thought you would enjoy this, Surf.


A computer taught to read a "price bar"?? That doesn't seem obviously illogical and ridiculous to you on a multitude of levels? You simply can't be serious.


By the way folks, if you are a price action trader--- Toby Crabel's book is the bible on the subject--- not to mention he has proven himself at the helm of a billion dollar plus fund for a number of years --- unlike these no name stealth vendor types and book authors who cater to retail bottom feeders.
 
Quote from marketsurfer:

Yes, I have losing trades and have got over confident at times. ( unlike the perfect record (near) you had posted on your site for a number of years.

Still waiting on the objective program for testing. September is getting close.

Surf Surf

All traders have losing trades.
All skilled traders should be confident about their system IF they are profitable.
No professional trader is closed minded nor too arrogant to learn new ways to improve on the way they trade.

You have my email address. Send me your mailing address and I send you the USB security key and nondisclosure agreement via certified mail. That way you can check out the NDA. It's a very straight forward tame agreement. Once you get them, I will send you a digital copy of the NDA to sign and return. Once I get that back I'll send the program to you to test. You should have it way before September.

Unlike you, I don't welsh on my agreements.

If you want to weasel out, now would be a good time.
 
Quote from marketsurfer:

A computer taught to read a "price bar"?? That doesn't seem obviously illogical and ridiculous to you on a multitude of levels? You simply can't be serious.

By the way folks, if you are a price action trader--- Toby Crabel's book is the bible on the subject--- not to mention he has proven himself at the helm of a billion dollar plus fund for a number of years --- unlike these no name stealth vendor types and book authors who cater to retail bottom feeders.

You speak of logic and illogical things but don't understand either. You just can't comprehend that you can't successfully program that which is not objective.

You speak of bibles as well but have no faith.

You call the posters here on ET bottom feeders like they are beneath you. You are a snob and an ass.

You speak highly of Toby Crabel's book which is about reading charts, something you don't believe in but ridicule individuals that try to technically move that exact viewpoint further ahead.

You speak of "book authors" with disdain but pat people like Covel on the back who offer this industry nothing but commentary, interviews and information found for free on the internet. You brag about being one yourself next year. You are a hypocrite.

You call me a stealth vendor and I have never once solicited a single person on this site for a nickel.

You lie, you are dishonest, you have no integrity and have an obvious substance abuse problem. I know your parents are proud of you.
 
Quote from ProfLogic:

All traders have losing trades.
All skilled traders should be confident about their system IF they are profitable.
No professional trader is closed minded nor too arrogant to learn new ways to improve on the way they trade.

You have my email address. Send me your mailing address and I send you the USB security key and nondisclosure agreement via certified mail. That way you can check out the NDA. It's a very straight forward tame agreement. Once you get them, I will send you a digital copy of the NDA to sign and return. Once I get that back I'll send the program to you to test. You should have it way before September.

Unlike you, I don't welsh on my agreements.

If you want to weasel out, now would be a good time.


I like to keep everything public, and will be happy o sign a NDA---as long as it doesnt preclude Me from sharing it with team members who are more skilled than I at testing.

intrendX llc
641 Lexington Ave
15th floor
New York, NY 10022
 
Quote from marketsurfer:

I like to keep everything public, and will be happy o sign a NDA---as long as it doesnt preclude Me from sharing it with team members who are more skilled than I at testing.

intrendX llc
641 Lexington Ave
15th floor
New York, NY 10022

If you are going to share it, they need to sign it.
Just tell me the how many in the group.
Pretty simple huh.
 
Back
Top