Al brooks says breakouts provide the largest edge for a trader yet...

Quote from Pekelo:

I agree, his stuff is cheap. 25 hours of video for $250 is a bargain and there are lots of Youtube videos for free.

The reason I call your argument a baloney, because Al probably disagrees with you. None of the books start with a warning, that it is advanced material and only traders (preferably already profitable) with a few years experience should read it. That would mean you are right and it is the college of trading.

Of course that would limit the possible buyers. You are basicly defending an obfuscating and hard to understand material by saying, no, it is not the book, it is the reader...

I think it is the book.... Now personally I believe there is value in his books and videos, but holy fuck!, why does he need 25 hours and 3 books to explain it???

And I also think he (or any guru) should have some kind of test account running showing at least a fairly decent return. It doesn't even have to be real money, but it should be profitable. A system on C2 would be fine and would make wonderful PR for his material...

Of course we have to assume that the account results would be positive... :)

I really don't care about the marketing aspects, so have at it. For $140 or $250 or whatever, no one has to show you anything. It's a text book. For buck forty what else can you expect?

And the reason the books are so long is because they are chock full of examples. I mean, tons of examples. The guy put in so much effort into digesting every chart to qualify his methods that that alone is well worth the money - even if you are a total novice.

I certainly appreciated the opportunity to see how one views the markets. Even if his stuff doesn't "work" (but that would be like saying the sun doesn't rise), learning what doesn't work is still worth something.

/Wulfrede
 
Quote from R. Raskolnikov:

Have you read the book? I haven't myself as I haven't been a big reader of trading materials in a long time but I'm curious as to your knowledge on his book, considering you are anti-TA.

So when did you read his book?

As a finance book reviewer for Wiley and others-- I get boxes of books monthly delivered to my door-- I skim them all, read some completely-- I had the Brooks book ( not sure how i got it or what happened to it) but found it unreadable.

surf
 
Quote from ChkitOut:

LOL, wow, you are way off base. Do you even realize how difficult the course work is to become an engineer? Have you ever thought about why prop trading firms hire from the science fields (engineering, math, physics). These highly successful trading firms only look to hire people with backgrounds that you say... please!

are you sure you even know what you're talking about? do you even trade?

you do realize this firm is packed full of these people that you say have no work ethic.

http://www.sig.com/

I am an engineer. '99 M.S. in Comp Sci. Ivy League. Yes, I know exactly how difficult it is.

/Wulfrede
 
So you didn't actually read it then. Ok, thanks. Not sure your input on this book is very relevant then. I didn't read it myself so therefore I don't have the audacity to negatively comment on something that I didn't read.

Quote from marketsurfer:

As a finance book reviewer for Wiley and others-- I get boxes of books monthly delivered to my door-- I skim them all, read some completely-- I had the Brooks book ( not sure how i got it or what happened to it) but found it unreadable.

surf
 
Quote from Wulfrede:

I am an engineer. '99 M.S. in Comp Sci. Ivy League. Yes, I know exactly how difficult it is.

/Wulfrede

ok, now you're all over the place and have become like al brooks.

one minute you say the requirements and work ethic are puullleese, the next minute you tell me you know how difficult it is.

because you sound just like al brooks, i think you'll just go on ignore.

thanks
 
Quote from ChkitOut:

he cannot tell us what a high probability trade looks like. he just cant do it.

Nowadays you will probably only see this in villages - an old lady who has a fabulous reputation as a cook, but does not know any recipes. Some of this, some of that, a pinch of this, a handful of that, keep tasting and when it is perfect, she knows. The only way to learn is to be with her in the kitchen for years. She learnt from her mother that way.

It is possible Brooks is that kind of trader, in which case trying to learn from his books is an exercise in futility. His books would be like recipes that list ingredients without any quantities.

At best, you get some ideas and develop something that works for you.

I finished his first book, tried out some of the stuff and quickly decided that is not how I want to trade.
 
Quote from ChkitOut:

ok, now you're all over the place and have become like al brooks.

one minute you say the requirements and work ethic are puullleese, the next minute you tell me you know how difficult it is.

because you sound just like al brooks, i think you'll just go on ignore.

thanks

You asked me if I knew the effort required to become an engineer. I answered yes. Further, I maintain that the effort to become a trader is far greater.

You seem to be having difficulty following a line of reasoning and that of an argument.

Let me spell it out for you: I was trying to help.

Best of luck.

/Wulfrede
 
Quote from Wulfrede:

I am an engineer. '99 M.S. in Comp Sci. Ivy League. Yes, I know exactly how difficult it is.

/Wulfrede

Of course you are. An M.Sc in CS is an EE degree? Learn new shit every day on this site.
 
Quote from atticus:

Of course you are. An M.Sc in CS is an EE degree? Learn new shit every day on this site.

CS is an Engineering degree. At least it was when I got it. My school was called SEAS (School of Engineering and Applied Science).

BTW, EE is Electrical Engineering. There are many kinds of engineers. But I digress.

/Wulfrede
 
Quote from R. Raskolnikov:

So you didn't actually read it then. Ok, thanks. Not sure your input on this book is very relevant then. I didn't read it myself so therefore I don't have the audacity to negatively comment on something that I didn't read.

I found it unreadable. That does not mean I didn't try to read it--- how dare you make such arrogant allegations.
 
Back
Top